Barriers and facilitators to use of a digital clinical decision support tool: a cohort study combining clickstream and survey data

Author:

Rosenberg JulieORCID,Miller Kate,Pickard Olivia,Henrich Natalie,Karlage Ami,Weintraub Rebecca

Abstract

ObjectivesThis research aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators clinicians face in using a digital clinical decision support tool—UpToDate—around the globe.DesignWe used a mixed-methods cohort study design that enrolled 1681 clinicians (physicians, surgeons or physician assistants) who applied for free access to UpToDate through our established donation programme during a 9-week study enrolment period. Eligibility included working outside of the USA for a limited-resource public or non-profit health facility, serving vulnerable populations, having at least intermittent internet access, completing the application in English; and not being otherwise able to afford the subscription.InterventionAfter consenting to study participation, clinicians received a 1-year subscription to UpToDate. They completed a series of surveys over the year, and we collected clickstream data tracking their use of the tool.Primary and secondary outcome measures(1) The variation in use by demographic; (2) the prevalence of barriers and facilitators of use; and (3) the relationship between barriers, facilitators and use.ResultsOf 1681 study enrollees, 69% were men and 71% were between 25 and 35 years old, with the plurality practicing general medicine and the majority in sub-Saharan Africa or Southeast Asia. Of the 11 barriers we assessed, fitting the tool into the workflow was a statistically significant barrier, making clinicians 50% less likely to use it. Of the 10 facilitators we assessed, a supportive professional context and utility were significant drivers of use.ConclusionsThere are several clear barriers and facilitators to promoting the use of digital clinical decision support tools in practice. We recommend tools like UpToDate be implemented with complementary services. These include generating a supportive professional context, helping clinicians realise the tools’ use and working with health systems to better integrate digital, clinical decision support tools into workflows.

Funder

Patrick J. McGovern Foundation

Goldsmith Foundation

Paul G Allen Family Foundation

Wolters Kluwer UpToDate

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference16 articles.

1. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine . Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), 2015.

2. Diagnostic Error in Internal Medicine

3. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting;Clairmont;Ann Intern Med,2007

4. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations

5. National Library of Medicine . Citations added to Medline by fiscal year, 2020. Available: https://www-nlm-nih-gov.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/bsd/stats/cit_added.html [Accessed 16 Nov 2021].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3