Abstract
ObjectivesThis research aimed to understand the barriers and facilitators clinicians face in using a digital clinical decision support tool—UpToDate—around the globe.DesignWe used a mixed-methods cohort study design that enrolled 1681 clinicians (physicians, surgeons or physician assistants) who applied for free access to UpToDate through our established donation programme during a 9-week study enrolment period. Eligibility included working outside of the USA for a limited-resource public or non-profit health facility, serving vulnerable populations, having at least intermittent internet access, completing the application in English; and not being otherwise able to afford the subscription.InterventionAfter consenting to study participation, clinicians received a 1-year subscription to UpToDate. They completed a series of surveys over the year, and we collected clickstream data tracking their use of the tool.Primary and secondary outcome measures(1) The variation in use by demographic; (2) the prevalence of barriers and facilitators of use; and (3) the relationship between barriers, facilitators and use.ResultsOf 1681 study enrollees, 69% were men and 71% were between 25 and 35 years old, with the plurality practicing general medicine and the majority in sub-Saharan Africa or Southeast Asia. Of the 11 barriers we assessed, fitting the tool into the workflow was a statistically significant barrier, making clinicians 50% less likely to use it. Of the 10 facilitators we assessed, a supportive professional context and utility were significant drivers of use.ConclusionsThere are several clear barriers and facilitators to promoting the use of digital clinical decision support tools in practice. We recommend tools like UpToDate be implemented with complementary services. These include generating a supportive professional context, helping clinicians realise the tools’ use and working with health systems to better integrate digital, clinical decision support tools into workflows.
Funder
Patrick J. McGovern Foundation
Goldsmith Foundation
Paul G Allen Family Foundation
Wolters Kluwer UpToDate
Reference16 articles.
1. Committee on Diagnostic Error in Health Care, Board on Health Care Services, Institute of Medicine . Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: National Academies Press (US), 2015.
2. Diagnostic Error in Internal Medicine
3. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting;Clairmont;Ann Intern Med,2007
4. The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations
5. National Library of Medicine . Citations added to Medline by fiscal year, 2020. Available: https://www-nlm-nih-gov.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/bsd/stats/cit_added.html [Accessed 16 Nov 2021].