WHO standards-based tools to measure service providers’ and service users’ views on the quality of hospital child care: development and validation in Italy

Author:

Lazzerini MarziaORCID,Mariani IlariaORCID,de Melo e Lima Tereza Rebecca,Felici Enrico,Martelossi Stefano,Lubrano Riccardo,Lucarelli Annunziata,Trobia Gian Luca,Cogo Paola,Peri Francesca,Nisticò Daniela,Were Wilson Milton,Baltag Valentina,Muzigaba Moise,Barbi Egidio

Abstract

ObjectivesEvidence showed that, even in high-income countries, children and adolescents may not receive high quality of care (QOC). We describe the development and initial validation, in Italy, of two WHO standards-based questionnaires to conduct an assessment of QOC for children and young adolescents at inpatient level, based on the provider and user perspectives.DesignMultiphase, mixed-methods study.Setting, participants and methodsThe two questionnaires were developed in four phases equally conducted for each tool. Phase 1 which included the prioritisation of the WHO Quality Measures according to predefined criteria and the development of the draft questionnaires. In phase 2 content face validation of the draft questionnaires was assessed among both experts and end-users. In phase 3 the optimised questionnaires were field tested to assess acceptability, perceived utility and comprehensiveness (N=163 end-users). In phase 4 intrarater reliability and internal consistency were evaluated (N=170 and N=301 end-users, respectively).ResultsThe final questionnaires included 150 WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was excellent (kappa value of 1). The field test resulted in response rates of 98% and 76% for service users and health providers, respectively. Among respondents, 96.9% service users and 90.4% providers rated the questionnaires as useful, and 86.9% and 93.9%, respectively rated them as comprehensive. Intrarater reliability was good, with Cohen’s kappa values exceeding 0.70. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.83 to 0.95, indicating excellent internal consistency.ConclusionsStudy findings suggest these tools developed have good content and face validity, high acceptability and perceived utility, and good intrarater reliability and internal consistency, and therefore could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar contexts. Priority areas for future research include how tools measuring paediatric QOC can be more effectively used to help health professionals provide the best possible care.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference44 articles.

1. UNICEF, WHO, World Bank, UN-DESA Population Division . Levels & trends in child mortality report 2020. Estimates developed by the U Inter-Agency Group for Child Mortality Estimation. Geneva: United Nations Children’s Fund, 2020. https://www.unicef.org/reports/levels-and-trends-child-mortality-report-2020

2. World Health Organization . Situation of child and adolescent health in Europe. World Health Organization, 2018.

3. World Health Organization, OECD & International Bank for Reconstruction and Development . Delivering quality health services: a global imperative for universal health coverage. World Health Organization, 2018. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/272465

4. Research in European pediatric emergency medicine Study Group. antibiotic prescription for febrile children in European emergency departments: a cross-sectional, observational study;Van de Maat;Lancet Infect Dis,2019

5. Differences in antibiotic prescribing in paediatric outpatients

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3