Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Retrospective analysis of the quality of reports by author-suggested and non-author-suggested reviewers in journals operating on open or single-blind peer review models

Published:2015-09 Issue:9 Volume:5 Page:e008707
ISSN:2044-6055
Container-title:BMJ Open
language:en
Short-container-title:BMJ Open

Author:

Kowalczuk Maria K^ORCID,Dudbridge Frank^ORCID,Nanda Shreeya,Harriman Stephanie L^ORCID,Patel Jigisha^ORCID,Moylan Elizabeth C^ORCID

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

1. Differences in review quality and recommendations for publication between peer reviewers suggested by authors or by editors;Schroter;JAMA,2006

2. Effect of open peer review on quality of reviews and on reviewers’ recommendations: a randomised trial;van Rooyen;BMJ,1999

3. Do author-suggested reviewers rate submissions more favorably than editor-suggested reviewers? A study on atmospheric chemistry and physics;Bornmann;PLoS ONE,2010

4. Reviewer selection: author or editor knows best?;Hurst;Thorax,2005

5. Effect of recommendations from reviewers suggested or excluded by authors;Moore;J Am Soc Nephrol,2011

Cited by 40 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Policy variation in the external evaluation of research for tenure at U.S. universities;Research Evaluation;2024-05-07

2. Open peer review, pros and cons from the perspective of an early career researcher;mBio;2023-10-31

3. Tips and tricks for how to become a good reviewer;Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy;2023-10-04

4. Research misconduct as a challenge for academic institutions and scientific journals;Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health;2023-09-04

5. The Peer Review System;Clinics in Podiatric Medicine and Surgery;2023-08