Tasks, multitasking and interruptions among the surgical team in an operating room: a prospective observational study

Author:

Göras CamillaORCID,Olin KarolinaORCID,Unbeck Maria,Pukk-Härenstam KarinORCID,Ehrenberg Anna,Tessma Mesfin Kassaye,Nilsson UlricaORCID,Ekstedt Mirjam

Abstract

ObjectivesThe work context of the operating room (OR) is considered complex and dynamic with high cognitive demands. A multidimensional view of the complete preoperative and intraoperative work process of the surgical team in the OR has been sparsely described. The aim of this study was to describe the type and frequency of tasks, multitasking, interruptions and their causes during surgical procedures from a multidimensional perspective on the surgical team in the OR.DesignProspective observational study using the Work Observation Method By Activity Timing tool.SettingAn OR department at a county hospital in Sweden.ParticipantsOR nurses (ORNs) (n=10), registered nurse anaesthetists (RNAs) (n=8) and surgeons (n=9).ResultsThe type, frequency and time spent on specific tasks, multitasking and interruptions were measured. From a multidimensional view, the surgical team performed 64 tasks per hour. Communication represented almost half (45.7%) of all observed tasks. Concerning task time, direct care dominated the surgeons’ and ORNs’ intraoperative time, while in RNAs’ work, it was intra-indirect care. In total, 48.2% of time was spent in multitasking and was most often observed in ORNs’ and surgeons’ work during communication. Interruptions occurred 3.0 per hour, and the largest proportion, 26.7%, was related to equipment. Interruptions were most commonly followed by professional communication.ConclusionsThe surgical team constantly dealt with multitasking and interruptions, both with potential impact on workflow and patient safety. Interruptions were commonly followed by professional communication, which may reflect the interactions and constant adaptations in a complex adaptive system. Future research should focus on understanding the complexity within the system, on the design of different work processes and on how teams meet the challenges of a complex adaptive system.Trial registration number2016/264.

Funder

The Center for Clinical Research Dalarna

Finnish state funding for university-level health research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference67 articles.

1. Understanding the cognitive work of nursing in the acute care environment;Potter;J Nurs Adm,2005

2. Can you multitask? Evidence and limitations of task switching and multitasking in emergency medicine;Skaugset;Ann Emerg Med,2016

3. Nemeth C , O’Connor M , Klock PA , et al . Advances in Patient Safety Cognitive Artifacts' Implications for Health Care Information Technology: Revealing How Practitioners Create and Share Their Understanding of Daily Work. In: Henriksen K , Battles JB , Marks ES , eds. Advances in patient safety: from research to implementation (Volume 2: concepts and methodology). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US), 2005.

4. Operating Room Management at the Edge of Order and Chaos;Tsai;J Med Pract Manage,2017

5. Braithwaite J , Churruca K , Ellis L , et al ; Complexity science in healthcare - aspirations, approaches. Applications and Accomplishments: A White Paper, 2017.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3