Author:
Kurdi Ahmed M,Majeed-Saidan Muhammad Ali,Al Rakaf Maha S,AlHashem Amal M,Botto Lorenzo D,Baaqeel Hassan S,Ammari Amer N
Abstract
ObjectiveTo assess the three key issues for congenital anomalies (CAs) prevention and care, namely, CA prevalence, risk factor prevalence and survival, in a longitudinal cohort in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.SettingTertiary care centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ParticipantsSaudi women enrolled during pregnancy over 3 years and their 28 646 eligible pregnancy outcomes (births, stillbirths and elective terminations of pregnancy for foetal anomalies). The nested case-control study evaluated the CA risk factor profile of the underlying cohort. All CA cases (1179) and unaffected controls (1262) were followed through age 2 years. Referred mothers because of foetal anomaly and mothers who delivered outside the study centre and their pregnancy outcome were excluded.Primary outcome measuresPrevalence and pattern of major CAs, frequency of CA-related risk factors and survival through age 2 years.ResultsThe birth prevalence of CAs was 412/10 000 births (95% CI 388.6 to 434.9), driven mainly by congenital heart disease (148 per 10 000) (95% CI 134 to 162), renal malformations (113, 95% CI 110 to 125), neural tube defects (19, 95% CI 25.3 to 38.3) and chromosomal anomalies (27, 95% CI 21 to 33). In this study, the burden of potentially modifiable risk factors included high rates of diabetes (7.3%, OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.04 to 2.12), maternal age >40 years (7.0%, OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.35 to 3.3), consanguinity (54.5%, OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.81). The mortality for live births with CAs at 2 years of age was 15.8%.ConclusionsThis study documented specific opportunities to improve primary prevention and care. Specifically, folic acid fortification (the neural tube defect prevalence was >3 times that theoretically achievable by optimal fortification), preconception diabetes screening and consanguinity-related counselling could have significant and broad health benefits in this cohort and arguably in the larger Saudi population.
Reference38 articles.
1. World Health Organization . Sixty -Third World health assembly. Ca report by the Secretariat, A63/10. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization, 2010.
2. World Health Organization . Global health Observatory (GHO) data. Under-five mortality, 2016. Available: http://www.who.int/gho/child_health/mortality/mortality_under_five_text/en/ [Accessed 12 Dec 2017].
3. Christianson AL , Howson CP , Modell B . Global report on CA: the hidden toll of dying and disabled children. White Plains (NY): March of Dimes Defects Foundation, 2006.
4. 20-Year survival of children born with congenital anomalies: a population-based study;Tennant;The Lancet,2010
5. Wang Y , Hu J , Druschel CM , et al . Twenty-five–year survival of children with birth defects in New York state: a population-based study. Birth Defects Research;201:995–1003.
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献