What medical students think about measurement of their well-being: cross-sectional survey and qualitative interviews

Author:

Simons GemmaORCID,Effah Raymond,Baldwin David S

Abstract

ObjectivesTo find out how medical students think well-being should be measured.DesignA mixed-methods study comprising a cross-sectional online survey (November 2020–March 2021) and semi-structured online interviews. Views on the frequency of availability for measurement, the format, type and purpose of measurement, and with whom well-being should be discussed were measured. When an outcome was scored 7–9 on a 9-point Likert scale of agreement by ≥75% of participants it was considered critical. Inductive thematic analysis was undertaken on the interview transcripts.SettingAll medicine programmes at University of Southampton.ParticipantsMedical students from all years took part in the survey (n=118) and interviews (n=16).ResultsMost participants (94%) felt able to give 5 min to measure their well-being at least once per month. Research, governance and individual feedback were all considered critically important. Only subjective assessments undertaken by the individual in real-time were rated critically important (78.1%) measurement tools. Students selected that they would discuss their well-being with other medical students (n=87) nearly as often as they selected a member of the faculty (n=104). Five interview themes further explained these findings: (1) well-being is mental well-being; (2) exercise and support from friends and family are most important; (3) isolation and the design of the medicine programme are detrimental to well-being; (4) there are advantages to surveys, and conversations; (5) personal academic tutors and medical students in later years are the best to discuss well-being with.ConclusionsMedical students thought that measurement of their well-being was critically important for governance showing their support for quality assurance of well-being and peer support. They wanted to be able to choose surveys, or conversations, to measure their well-being, as well as the person they discussed well-being with. Four recommendations are discussed in light of these findings.

Funder

Health Education England

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference83 articles.

1. General Medical Council . Caring for doctors, caring for patients. How to transform UK healthcare environments to support doctors and medical students to care for patients, 2019. Available: https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/caring-for-doctors-caring-for-patients_pdf-80706341.pdf

2. Universities UK Task Group on Student Mental Health . Minding our future; starting a conversation about the support of student mental health, 2019. https://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/sites/default/files/field/downloads/2021-07/minding-our-future-starting-conversation-student-mental-health.pdf

3. Medical Protection Society . 85% of doctors have experienced mental health issues, reveals Medical Protection survey, 2016. https://www.medicalprotection.org/uk/articles/85-of-doctors-have-experienced-mental-health-issues-reveals-medical-protection-survey#:~:text=Medical%20Protection%20survey-,85%25%20of%20doctors%20have%20experienced%20mental,issues%2C%20reveals%20Medical%20Protection%20survey&text=A%20Medical%20Protection%20survey%20of,self%2Desteem%20(36%25)

4. British Medical Association . Caring for the mental health of the medical workforce, 2019. Available: https://www.bma.org.uk/advice-and-support/nhs-delivery-and-workforce/workforce/mental-health-workforce-report

5. Kinman G , Teoh K . What could make a difference to the mental health of UK doctors? A review of the research evidence.: Society of occupational medicine, 2018. Available: https://www.som.org.uk/sites/som.org.uk/files/What_could_make_a_difference_to_the_mental_health_of_UK_doctors_LTF_SOM.pdf

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Measuring Wellbeing;The Mental Health of Medical Students;2024-01-25

2. Opening the black box of school-wide student wellbeing programmes: a critical narrative review informed by activity theory;Advances in Health Sciences Education;2023-07-02

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3