Evidence mapping and overview of systematic reviews of the effects of acupuncture therapies

Author:

Lu LimingORCID,Zhang YuqingORCID,Ge Shuqi,Wen Hao,Tang XiaorongORCID,Zeng Jing chunORCID,Wang Lai,Zeng Zhao,Rada GabrielORCID,Ávila CamilaORCID,Vergara CamiloORCID,Chen RouhaoORCID,Dong Yu,Wei Xiaojing,Luo WenORCID,Wang Lin,Guyatt Gordon,Tang Chun-Zhi,Xu Neng-Gui

Abstract

ObjectiveTo provide a route map regarding systematic reviews (SRs) of acupuncture therapies that will meet two goals: (1) to identify areas in which more or better evidence is required and (2) to identify acupuncture applications that, although proven effective, remain underused in practice, and thus warrant more effective knowledge dissemination.Eligibility criteriaWe included SRs that conducted meta-analyses (MAs) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) for this overview.Information sourcesWe searched for SRs without language restrictions from January 2015 to November 2020 in four Chinese electronic databases and Epistemonikos database. And we also searched for newly published RCTs that were eligible for selected best SRs in PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase and four Chinese electronic databases from its lasted search dates to November 2020.Synthesis of resultsWe reanalysed the selected MAs if new primary studies were added. We used random-effect model to calculate the overall effect.ResultsOur search identified 120 SRs published in the last 5 years addressing acupuncture therapies across 12 therapeutic areas and 77 diseases and conditions. The SRs included 205 outcomes and involved 138 995 participants from 1402 RCTs. We constructed 77 evidence matrices, including 120 SRs and their included RCTs in the Epistemonikos database. Seventy-seven SRs represented the effect estimate of acupuncture therapies. Finally, we system summarised the areas of possible underutilisation of acupuncture therapies (high or moderate certainty evidence of large or moderate effects), and the areas of warranting additional investigation of acupuncture therapies (low or very low certainty evidence of moderate or large effects).ConclusionThe evidence maps and overview of SRs on acupuncture therapies identified both therapies with substantial benefits that may require more assertive evidence dissemination and promising acupuncture therapies that require further investigation.

Funder

National Natural Science Foundation of China

The special project of "Lingnan modernization of traditional Chinese medicine" in 2019 Guangdong Provincial R & D Program

The Chinese Medicine Innovation Team Project of the State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine

the Project of First Class Universities and High-level Dual Discipline for Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference24 articles.

1. Publication Trends in Acupuncture Research: A 20-Year Bibliometric Analysis Based on PubMed

2. Organization WH . Who traditional medicine strategy: 2014-2023. Geneva Switzerland: WHO, 2013.

3. WFAS . 2013: communication to WHO from the world Federation of Acupuncture-Moxibustion societies (WFAS) in March 2013.

4. Acupuncture for the relief of chronic pain: a synthesis of systematic reviews;Paley;Medicina,2019

5. Acupuncture: Past, Present, and Future

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3