Exploration of the uptake of asymptomatic COVID-19 lateral flow testing in Birmingham, UK: survey and qualitative research

Author:

Mathers JonathanORCID,Poyner Christopher,Thompson Dean,Rudge Gavin,Pritchett Ruth V

Abstract

AimTo examine public perspectives on lateral flow testing (LFT) for COVID-19.DesignOnline survey with nested semi-structured interviews.SettingBirmingham, UK.Participants220 Birmingham residents, 21 of whom took part in an interview.ResultsFifty-six per cent of respondents had taken an LFT. Reasons for not testing included adherence to other government COVID-19 guidance, having had a vaccination and not thinking LFTs were accurate. In 16% of households with children nobody, including children, was testing. In households where children were testing, their parents or other adults were often not. Those who were testing and eligible for workplace and school testing were more likely to be testing twice weekly. In other settings, respondents were more likely to be testing on a one-off or ad hoc basis. Approximately half of respondents said that they were likely to visit friends and family after a negative test result and 10% that they were unlikely to self-isolate following a positive test result. In interviews, participants who were testing described the peace of mind that testing afforded them prior to activities or interactions with family and friends, including those they considered to be vulnerable. Interviewees who were not testing described concerns about test accuracy and also cited a lack of face-to-face interaction with others precluding the need to test. Participants were often testing flexibly according to circumstances and perceived risk of COVID-19 transmission.ConclusionsWhile some choose not to test, others are doing so in order to provide peace of mind to engage in personal interactions they might otherwise have avoided. This peace of mind may be a necessary pre-requisite for some to more fully re-engage in pre-pandemic activities. Despite clear concerns about test accuracy among those not testing, those who are testing held generally positive attitudes towards the continued use of LFTs.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Order coronavirus (COVID-19) rapid lateral flow tests, 2021. Available: https://www.gov.uk/order-coronavirus-rapid-lateral-flow-tests [Accessed 18 Aug 21].

2. Lateral flow tests cannot rule out SARS- CoV-2 infection

3. Dinnes J , Davenport C . BMJ opinion, 2021. Available: https://blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2021/03/16/do-we-have-informed-consent-for-asymptomatic-testing-in-schools/

4. Rapid, point-of-care antigen and molecular-based tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection

5. Liverpool TUo . Liverpool covid-SMART community testing pilot - evaluation report. 2021 17 June 2021.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3