Mapping outcomes for recovery of consciousness in studies from 1986 to 2020: a scoping review protocol

Author:

Weaver JenniferORCID,Cogan AlisonORCID,Bhandari ParieORCID,Awan Bint-e ZainabORCID,Jacobs EricaORCID,Pape Ariana,Nguyen ChantalORCID,Guernon Ann,Harrod TomORCID,Bender Pape Theresa,Mallinson Trudy,

Abstract

IntroductionHistorically, heterogeneous outcome assessments have been used to measure recovery of consciousness in patients with disorders of consciousness (DoC) following traumatic brain injury (TBI), making it difficult to compare across studies. To date, however, there is no comprehensive review of clinical outcome assessments that are used in intervention studies of adults with DoC. The objective of this scoping review is to develop a comprehensive inventory of clinical outcome assessments for recovery of consciousness that have been used in clinical studies of adults with DoC following TBI.Methods and analysisThe methodological framework for this review is: (1) identify the research questions, (2) identify relevant studies, (3) select studies, (4) chart the data, (5) collate, summarise and report results and (6) consult stakeholders to drive knowledge translation. We will identify relevant studies by searching the following electronic bibliographic databases: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO and The Cochrane Library (including Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Methodology Register). Criteria for article inclusion are published in the English-language, peer-reviewed studies of interventions aimed at facilitating recovery of consciousness among adults (> 18 years) with DoC following a severe TBI, published from January 1986 to December 2020. Articles meeting inclusion criteria at this stage will undergo a full text review. We will chart the data by applying the WHO International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Framework to identify the content areas of clinical outcome assessments. To support knowledge translation efforts, we will involve clinicians and researchers experienced in TBI care throughout the project from conceptualisation of the study through dissemination of results.Ethics and disseminationNo ethical approval is required for this study as it is not determined to be human subjects research. Results will be presented at national conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberCRD42017058383.

Funder

US Department of Defense

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. Placebo-Controlled Trial of Amantadine for Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

2. Neural connectivity changes facilitated by familiar auditory sensory training in disordered consciousness: a TBI pilot study;Bender Pape;Front Neurol,2020

3. Placebo-Controlled Trial of Familiar Auditory Sensory Training for Acute Severe Traumatic Brain Injury

4. Minimum competency recommendations for programs that provide rehabilitation services for persons with disorders of consciousness: a position statement of the American Congress of rehabilitation medicine and the National Institute on disability, independent living and rehabilitation research traumatic brain injury model systems;Giacino;Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2020

5. Giacino JT , Katz DI , Schiff ND . Practice guideline update recommendations summary: disorders of consciousness: report of the Guideline development, Dissemination, and Implementation Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology; the American Congress of rehabilitation medicine; and the National Institute on disability, independent living, and rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2018;99.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3