Qualitative exploration of health professionals’ experiences of communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results for nine conditions in England

Author:

Chudleigh JaneORCID,Chinnery Holly,Bonham Jim R,Olander Ellinor,Moody Louise,Simpson Alan,Morris StephenORCID,Ulph Fiona,Bryon Mandy,Southern Kevin

Abstract

ObjectiveTo explore health professionals’ experiences of communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening (NBS) results, highlight differences, share good practice and make recommendations for future research.DesignQualitative exploratory design was employed using semi-structured interviewsSettingThree National Health Service provider organisations in EnglandParticipantsSeventeen health professionals involved in communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results to parents for all nine conditions currently included in the newborn bloodspot screening programme in England.ResultsFindings indicated variation in approaches to communicating positive newborn bloodspot screening results to parents, largely influenced by resources available and the lack of clear guidance. Health professionals emphasised the importance of communicating results to families in a way that is sensitive to their needs. However, many challenges hindered communication including logistical considerations; difficulty contacting the family and other health professionals; language barriers; parental reactions; resource considerations; lack of training; and insufficient time.ConclusionHealth professionals invest a lot of time and energy trying to ensure communication of positive newborn bloodspot screening results to families is done well. However, there continues to be great variation in the way these results are communicated to parents and this is largely influenced by resources available but also the lack of concrete guidance. How best to support health professionals undertaking this challenging and emotive task requires further exploration. We recommend evaluation of a more cohesive approach that meets the needs of parents and staff while being sensitive to the subtleties of each condition.Trial registration numberISRCTN15330120

Funder

Health Services and Delivery Research Programme

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre . Health professional Handbook: a guide to newborn blood spot screening for healthcare professionals. London: UK Newborn Screening Programme Centre, 2012: 1–56.

2. Editorial overview: newborn screening for cystic fibrosis--benefit or bane?;Bush;Paediatr Respir Rev,2008

3. Public Health England . Newborn blood spot screening programme in the UK: data collection and performance analysis report 2016 to 2017. London, 2018: 1–65.

4. Public Health England . Nhs sickle cell and thalassaemia screening programme data report 2015/16: trends and performance analysis. London, 2017: 1–81.

5. Public Health England . Newborn blood spot screening: programme Handbook: public health England, 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3