Narrative medicine-based intervention in primary care to reduce polypharmacy: results from the cluster-randomised controlled trial MultiCare AGENDA

Author:

Schäfer Ingmar,Kaduszkiewicz Hanna,Mellert Christine,Löffler Christin,Mortsiefer Achim,Ernst Annette,Stolzenbach Carl-Otto,Wiese Birgitt,Abholz Heinz-Harald,Scherer Martin,van den Bussche Hendrik,Altiner Attila

Abstract

ObjectivesTo determine if patient-centred communication leads to a reduction of the number of medications taken without reducing health-related quality of life.DesignTwo-arm cluster-randomised controlled trial.Setting55 primary care practices in Hamburg, Düsseldorf and Rostock, Germany.Participants604 patients 65 to 84 years of age with at least three chronic conditions.InterventionsWithin the 12-month intervention, general practitioners (GPs) had three 30 min talks with each of their patients in addition to routine consultations. The first talk aimed at identifying treatment targets and priorities of the patient. During the second talk, the medication taken by the patient was discussed based on a ‘brown bag’ review of all the medications the patient had at home. The third talk served to discuss goal attainment and future treatment targets. GPs in the control group performed care as usual.Primary outcome measuresWe assumed that the number of medications taken by the patient would be reduced by 1.5 substances in the intervention group and that the change in the intervention group’s health-related quality of life would not be statistically significantly inferior to the control group.ResultsThe patients took a mean of 7.0±3.5 medications at baseline and 6.8±3.5 medications at follow-up. There was no difference between treatment and control group in the change of the number of medications taken (0.43; 95% CI −0.07 to 0.93; P=0.094) and no difference in health-related quality of life (0.03; −0.02 to 0.08; P=0.207). The likelihood of receiving a new prescription for analgesics was twice as high in the intervention group compared with the control group (risk ratio, 2.043; P=0.019), but the days spent in hospital were reduced by the intervention (−3.07; −5.25 to −0.89; P=0.006).ConclusionsIntensifying the doctor–patient dialogue and discussing the patient’s agenda and personal needs did not lead to a reduction of medication intake and did not alter health-related quality of life.Trial registration numberNCT46272088; Pre-results.

Funder

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3