Patient priorities in relation to surgery for gastric cancer: qualitative interviews with gastric cancer surgery patients to inform the development of a core outcome set

Author:

Alkhaffaf BilalORCID,Blazeby Jane M,Bruce Iain A,Morris Rebecca LORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveThe reporting of outcomes in surgical trials for gastric cancer is inconsistent. The GASTROS study (GAstric CancerSurgeryTRialsReportedOutcomeStandardisation) aims to address this by developing a core outcome set (COS) for use in all future trials within this field. A COS should reflect the views of all stakeholders, including patients. We undertook a series of interviews to identify outcomes important to patients which would be considered for inclusion in a COS.SettingAll interviews took place within the UK. Interviews were carried out face-to-face at hospitals and cancer support centres or via the telephone.ParticipantsTwenty participants at varying stages of recovery following surgery for gastric cancer with curative intent.DesignQualitative design using semistructured interviews, supported by an interview guide which was iteratively modified; thematic analysis was used to explore patient priorities.ResultsSix themes enveloping 38 outcomes were identified; surviving and controlling cancer, technical aspects of surgery, adverse events from surgery, recovering from surgery, long-term problems following surgery and long-term life impact of surgery. The ‘most important’ patient priority was to be ‘cured of cancer’.ConclusionSurgical trials for gastric cancer should consider broader priorities of patients when choosing which outcomes to report. This study highlighted the importance of longer-term outcomes such as cancer survival. Outcomes identified in this study will be used to inform an international Delphi survey to develop a COS in this field.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference23 articles.

1. Fact sheets by cancer. Available: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Pages/fact_sheets_cancer.aspx [Accessed 24 Jul 2017].

2. Global patterns of cardia and non-cardia gastric cancer incidence in 2012

3. Variations among 5 European countries for curative treatment of resectable oesophageal and gastric cancer: A survey from the EURECCA Upper GI Group (EUropean REgistration of Cancer CAre);Messager;Eur J Surg Oncol,2016

4. Michalowski J , Salvador A , Napper R . Commissioned by healthcare quality improvement partnership national oesophago-gastric cancer audit 2018 an audit of the care received by people with oesophago-gastric cancer in England and Wales 2018 annual report, 2018. Available: https://www.nogca.org.uk/content/uploads/2018/09/NOGCA-2018-Annual-Report-1.pdf [Accessed 2 Jan 2019].

5. Alkhaffaf B , Blazeby JM , Williamson PR , et al . Reporting of outcomes in gastric cancer surgery trials: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2018;8:e021796.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021796

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3