Predictors of modern contraceptive use among women and men in Uganda: a population-level analysis

Author:

Namasivayam AmritaORCID,Lovell Sarah,Namutamba Sarah,Schluter Philip JORCID

Abstract

Objective(s)Despite substantial and rapid improvements in contraceptive uptake in Uganda, many women continue to have unmet need for contraception. As factors affecting contraceptive use are dynamic and complex, this study seeks to identify current predictors and provide effect size estimates of contraceptive use among women and men in Uganda.Study designA nationally representative cross-sectional population survey, using secondary data from Uganda’s 2016 Demographic and Health Survey. Stratified by sex, weighted bivariable and multivariable logistic regression models were derived from a suite of potential predictor variables. Predictive abilities were assessed via 10-fold cross-validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).SettingUganda.ParticipantsAll women aged 15–49 years who were permanent residents of the selected households or stayed in the household the night before the survey were eligible to participate. In one-third of the sampled households, all men aged 15–54 years who met the same residence criteria were also eligible.Primary outcome measuresModern contraceptive use.ResultsOverall, 4914 (26.6%) women and 1897 (35.6%) men reported using a modern contraceptive method. For women and men, both demographic and proximate variables were significantly associated with contraceptive use, although notable differences in effect sizes existed between sexes—especially for age, level of education and parity. Predictively, the multivariable model was acceptable for women with AUC=0.714 (95% CI 0.704 to 0.720) but less so for men with AUC=0.654 (95% CI 0.636 to 0.666).Conclusion(s)Contemporary significant predictors of contraceptive use among women and men were reported, thereby enabling key Ugandan subpopulations who would benefit from more targeted family planning initiatives to be identified. However, the acceptable AUC for women and modest AUC for men suggest that other important unmeasured predictors may exist. Nonetheless, these evidence-based findings remain important for informing future programmatic and policy directions for family planning in Uganda.

Funder

University of Canterbury

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. Contraception and health

2. Namasivayam A , Lovell S , Namutamba S , et al . Improved contraceptive use among women and men in Uganda between 1995-2016: a repeated cross-sectional population study. PLoS One 2019;14:e0219963.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0219963

3. Uganda Bureau of Statistics . Uganda Demographic and Health Survey 2016: Key indicators report. Kampala, Uganda: Uganda Bureau of Statistics and ICF International, 2017.

4. The World Bank . Maternal mortality ratio (modeled estimate, per 100,000 live births. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group, and the United Nations Population Division, 2015. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SH.STA.MMRT?locations=UG

5. Izugbara CO , Wekesah FM , Tilahun T , et al . Family planning in East Africa: trends and dynamics. Nairobi, Kenya: African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), 2018.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3