Differences in medication beliefs between pregnant women using medication, or not, for chronic diseases: a cross-sectional, multinational, web-based study

Author:

Roldan Munoz SoniaORCID,Lupattelli Angela,de Vries Sieta T,Mol Peter G M,Nordeng Hedvig

Abstract

ObjectivesTo assess whether medication beliefs differ between women who use or not use medication for their somatic chronic diseases during pregnancy and whether this association varies across diseases.DesignCross-sectional web-based survey.SettingMultinational study in Europe.ParticipantsPregnant women or women with children less than 1 year old from European countries and with asthma, allergy, cardiovascular, rheumatic diseases, diabetes, epilepsy and/or inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).Primary and secondary outcome measureDifferences in scores of theBeliefs about Medicines Questionnaire(BMQ).ResultsIn total, 1219 women were included (ranging from 736 for allergy to 49 for IBD). Women using medication for their chronic disease (n=770; 63%) had higher scores on the BMQ subscalesnecessity(16.6 vs 12.1, p<0.001) andbenefits(16.2 vs 15.4, p<0.001), and lower values on the subscalesoveruse(12.5 vs 13.1; p=0.005) andharm(9.8 vs 10.7, p<0.001) than women not using medication. No significant differences were shown for theconcernssubscale (12.5 vs 12.3, p=0.484). Beliefs varied somewhat across diseases but in general more positive beliefs among women using medication were shown. Epilepsy was the disease where less differences were observed between women using and not using medication.ConclusionWomen’s beliefs were associated with medication use during pregnancy with only small differences across the diseases. Knowing pregnant women’s beliefs could help identify women who are reluctant to use medication and could guide counselling to support making well-informed treatment decisions.

Funder

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

H2020 European Research Council

Foundation for Promotion of Norwegian Pharmacies and the Norwegian Pharmaceutical Society, Oslo, Norway

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3