Methodological guidelines and publications of benefit–risk assessment for health technology assessment: a scoping review

Author:

Suzumura Erica AranhaORCID,de Oliveira Ascef BrunaORCID,Maia Fernando Henrique de Albuquerque,Bortoluzzi Aline Frossard Ribeiro,Domingues Sidney Marcel,Farias Natalia Santos,Gabriel Franciele CordeiroORCID,Jahn Beate,Siebert UweORCID,de Soarez Patricia CoelhoORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo map the available methodological guidelines and documents for conducting and reporting benefit–risk assessment (BRA) during health technologies’ life cycle; and to identify methodological guidelines for BRA that could serve as the basis for the development of a BRA guideline for the context of health technology assessment (HTA) in Brazil.DesignScoping review.MethodsSearches were conducted in three main sources up to March 2023: (1) electronic databases; (2) grey literature (48 HTA and regulatory organisations) and (3) manual search and contacting experts. We included methodological guidelines or publications presenting methods for conducting or reporting BRA of any type of health technologies in any context of the technology’s life cycle. Selection process and data charting were conducted by independent reviewers. We provided a structured narrative synthesis of the findings.ResultsFrom the 83 eligible documents, six were produced in the HTA context, 30 in the regulatory and 35 involved guidance for BRA throughout the technology’s life cycle. We identified 129 methodological approaches for BRA in the documents. The most commonly referred to descriptive frameworks were the Problem, Objectives, Alternatives, Consequences, Trade-offs, Uncertainty, Risk and Linked decisions and the Benefit–Risk Action Team. Multicriteria decision analysis was the most commonly cited quantitative framework. We also identified the most cited metric indices, estimation and utility survey techniques that could be used for BRA.ConclusionsMethods for BRA in HTA are less established. The findings of this review, however, will support and inform the elaboration of the Brazilian methodological guideline on BRA for HTA.Trial registration numberhttps://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/69T3V.

Funder

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico

Publisher

BMJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3