Clinical effectiveness and cost effectiveness of individual mental health workers colocated within primary care practices: a systematic literature review

Author:

Woods Jean-BaptisteORCID,Greenfield GevaORCID,Majeed AzeemORCID,Hayhoe BenedictORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesMental health disorders contribute significantly to the global burden of disease and lead to extensive strain on health systems. The integration of mental health workers into primary care has been proposed as one possible solution, but evidence of clinical and cost effectiveness of this approach is unclear. We reviewed the clinical and cost effectiveness of mental health workers colocated within primary care practices.DesignSystematic literature review.Data sourcesWe searched the Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Healthcare Management Information Consortium (HMIC) and Global Health databases.Eligibility criteriaAll quantitative studies published before July 2019 were eligible for the review; participants of any age and gender were included. Studies did not need to report a certain outcome measure or comparator in order to be eligible.Data extraction and synthesisData were extracted using a standardised table; however, pooled analysis proved unfeasible. Studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool and the Cochrane collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.ResultsFifteen studies from four countries were included. Mental health worker integration was associated with mental health benefits to varied populations, including minority groups and those with comorbid chronic diseases. Furthermore, the interventions were correlated with high patient satisfaction and increases in specialist mental health referrals among minority populations. However, there was insufficient evidence to suggest clinical outcomes were significantly different from usual general practitioner care.ConclusionsWhile there appear to be some benefits associated with mental health worker integration in primary care practices, we found insufficient evidence to conclude that an onsite primary care mental health worker is significantly more clinically or cost effective when compared with usual general practitioner care. There should therefore be an increased emphasis on generating new evidence from clinical trials to better understand the benefits and effectiveness of mental health workers colocated within primary care practices.

Funder

NIHR

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference52 articles.

1. Rehm J , Shield KD . Global burden of disease and the impact of mental and addictive disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2019;21:10. doi:10.1007/s11920-019-0997-0

2. Global Health Data Exchange . Global burden of disease results tool, 2017 data [online], 2019. Available: http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool [Accessed 13 Jul 2019].

3. WHO, World Organisation of National Colleges, Academies and Academic Associations of General Practitioners/Family Physicians . Integrating mental health into primary care: a global perspective. Geneva, Switzerland; London: World Health Organization, WONCA, 2008: 206.

4. Nondetection of depression by primary care physicians reconsidered - PubMed - NCBI [online]. Available: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7737492 [Accessed 13 Jul 2019].

5. Are There Detectable Differences in Quality of Care or Outcome of Depression across Primary Care Providers? on JSTOR [online]. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3767164 [Accessed 13 Jul 2019].

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3