New geographic model of care to manage the post-COVID-19 elective surgery aftershock in England: a retrospective observational study

Author:

Clarke JonathanORCID,Murray Alice,Markar Sheraz RehanORCID,Barahona MauricioORCID,Kinross James

Abstract

ObjectivesThe suspension of elective surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic is unprecedented and has resulted in record volumes of patients waiting for operations. Novel approaches that maximise capacity and efficiency of surgical care are urgently required. This study applies Markov multiscale community detection (MMCD), an unsupervised graph-based clustering framework, to identify new surgical care models based on pooled waiting-lists delivered across an expanded network of surgical providers.DesignRetrospective observational study using Hospital Episode Statistics.SettingPublic and private hospitals providing surgical care to National Health Service (NHS) patients in England.ParticipantsAll adult patients resident in England undergoing NHS-funded planned surgical procedures between 1 April 2017 and 31 March 2018.Main outcome measuresThe identification of the most common planned surgical procedures in England (high-volume procedures (HVP)) and proportion of low, medium and high-risk patients undergoing each HVP. The mapping of hospitals providing surgical care onto optimised groupings based on patient usage data.ResultsA total of 7 811 891 planned operations were identified in 4 284 925 adults during the 1-year period of our study. The 28 most common surgical procedures accounted for a combined 3 907 474 operations (50.0% of the total). 2 412 613 (61.7%) of these most common procedures involved ‘low risk’ patients. Patients travelled an average of 11.3 km for these procedures. Based on the data, MMCD partitioned England into 45, 16 and 7 mutually exclusive and collectively exhaustive natural surgical communities of increasing coarseness. The coarser partitions into 16 and seven surgical communities were shown to be associated with balanced supply and demand for surgical care within communities.ConclusionsPooled waiting-lists for low-risk elective procedures and patients across integrated, expanded natural surgical community networks have the potential to increase efficiency by innovatively flexing existing supply to better match demand.

Funder

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council

Wellcome Trust

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. Are we harming cancer patients by delaying their cancer surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic?;Turaga;Ann Surg,2020

2. Approaching surgical triage during the COVID-19 pandemic;Brindle;Ann Surg,2020

3. American College of Surgeons . COVID-19: elective case triage guidelines for surgical care. Available: https://www.facs.org/covid-19/clinical-guidance/elective-case

4. Royal College of Surgeons . COVID-19: good practice for surgeons and surgical teams. England: Royal College of Surgeons, 2020.

5. Elective surgery cancellations due to the COVID-19 pandemic: global predictive modelling to inform surgical recovery plans;Nepogodiev;Br J Surg,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3