Supporting patient and public partners in writing lay summaries of scientific evidence in healthcare: a scoping review protocol

Author:

Zarshenas SarehORCID,Mosel JoAnne,Chui Adora,Seaton Samantha,Singh Hardeep,Moroz Sandra,Khan Tayaba,Colquhoun Heather

Abstract

IntroductionDespite growing interest among patient and public partners to engage in writing lay summaries, evidence is scarce regarding the availability of resources to support them. This protocol describes the process of conducting a scoping review to: (1) summarise the source, criteria and characteristics, content, format, intended target audience, patient and public involvement in preparing guidance and development processes in the available guidance for writing lay summaries; (2) contextualise the available guidance to the needs/preferences of patient and public partners and (3) create a patient and public partner-informed output to support their engagement in writing lay summaries.Method and analysisA scoping review with an integrated knowledge translation approach will be used to ensure the collaboration between patient/public partners and researchers in all steps of the review. To meet objective 1, the English language evidence within a healthcare context that provides guidance for writing lay summaries will be searched in peer-reviewed publications and grey literature. All screening and extraction steps will be performed independently by two reviewers. Extracted data will be organised by adapting the European Union’s principles for summaries of clinical trials for laypersons. For objectives 2 and 3, a consultation exercise will be held with patient and public partners to review and contextualise the findings from objective 1. A directed content analysis will be used to organise the data to the needs of the public audience. Output development will follow based on the results.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval will be obtained for the consultation exercise. Our target audience will be stakeholders who engage or are interested in writing lay summaries. Our dissemination products will include a manuscript, a lay summary and an output to support patient and public partners with writing lay summaries. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at relevant conferences.Open science framework registrationosf.io/2dvfg.

Funder

Operating grant: Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research-Guidelines and Systematic Reviews: The Evidence Alliance.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference34 articles.

1. Culture and process change as a priority for patient engagement in medicines development;Boutin;Ther Innov Regul Sci,2017

2. Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research . Patient engagement framework.. Available: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html [Accessed Jan 2022].

3. Patient and public engagement in integrated knowledge translation research: are we there yet?;Banner;Res Involv Engagem,2019

4. Twelve lessons learned for effective research partnerships between patients, caregivers, clinicians, academic researchers, and other stakeholders;Witteman;J Gen Intern Med,2018

5. Plain-language summaries: an essential component to promote knowledge translation;Gudi;Int J Clin Pract,2021

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3