Factors associated with declaration of disability in medical students and junior doctors, and the association of declared disability with academic performance: observational study using data from the UK Medical Education Database, 2002–2018 (UKMED54)

Author:

Murphy Michael JORCID,Dowell Jon SORCID,Smith Daniel TORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo examine factors associated with declaration of disability by medical students and doctors, and the association of declared disability with academic performance.DesignObservational study using record-linked data collected between 2002 and 2018.SettingUK Medical Education Database is a repository of data relating to training of medical students and doctors. Disability and other data are record-linked.ParticipantsAll students starting at a UK medical school between 2002 and 2018 (n=135 930).Main outcome measuresDeclared disability was categorised by the Higher Education Statistics Authority. Outcomes related to undergraduate academic performance included scores in the educational performance measure (EPM), prescribing safety assessment and situational judgement test. Performance in postgraduate examinations was studied, as well as prior attainment in school examinations and aptitude tests.ResultsSpecific learning disability (SLD) was the most commonly declared disability (3.5% compared with the next most commonly declared disability at 1.0% of n=129 345 all cases in the study), and during the period covered by the data, SLD declarations increased from 1.4% (n=6440 for students starting in 2002) to 4.6% (n=8625 for students starting in 2018). In a logistic regression, the following factors predicted recording of SLD on entry to medical school ((exp(B)±95% CI), p<0.0001 unless otherwise stated): attendance at a fee-paying school (2.306±0.178), graduate status (1.806±0.205), participation of local areas quintile (1.089±0.030), age (1.034±0.012). First year medical students were less likely to declare SLD if they were from a non-white ethnic background (Asian/Asian British 0.324±0.034, black/black British 0.571±0.102, mixed 0.731±0.108, other ethnic groups 0.566±0.120), female (0.913±0.059; p=0.007) or from a low index of multiple deprivation quintile (0.963±0.029); p=0.017. In univariate analysis with Bonferroni corrections applied for multiple tests, no significant difference was observed in the recording of SLD according to socioeconomic class (χ2=5.637, p=1), whether or not a student’s parents had a higher education (χ2=0.140, p=1), or whether or not a student had received a United Kingdom Clinical Aptitude Test (UKCAT) bursary (χ2=7.661, p=0.068). Students who declared SLD at some point in medical school (n=4830) had lower EPM normalised deviate values (−0.390) than those who did not (−0.119) (F=189.872, p<0.001). Those for whom SLD was recorded were as likely to complete the course successfully as those who did not declare disability (93.0% successful completion by those for whom SLD declared from year 1 (n=2480), 92.2% by those for whom SLD declared after year 1 (n=2350), 91.6% by those for whom SD not declared at any point (n=85 180)) (χ2=6.905, p=0.032). Of 3580 first year students who declared SLD, 43.1% had not sat the UKCAT Special Educational Needs aptitude test (which gives extra time for those with special educational needs), while 28% of 2400 registrants for whom SLD was recorded as medical students did not declare it at General Medical Council registration.ConclusionsSubstantial increases in declaration of SLD may reflect changes in the social and legal environment during the period of the study. Those who declare SLD are just as likely to gain a primary medical qualification as those who do not. For some individuals, disability declaration appears to depend on context, based on differences in numbers declaring SLD before, during and after medical school.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. British Medical Association . Disability equality in the medical profession. British Medical Association, 2007. http://www.hscbusiness.hscni.net/pdf/BMA-_Disability_equality_in_the_medical_profession_July_2007_pdf.pdf

2. British Medical Association . Disability in the medical profession. British Medical Association, 2020. https://www.bma.org.uk/media/2923/bma-disability-in-the-medical-profession.pdf

3. General Medical Council . Gateways to the professions: advising medical schools: encouraging disabled students. General Medical Council, 2008. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Gateways_guidance___legal_review_2008.pdf_59579404.pdf

4. General Medical Council . Gateways to the professions: advising medical schools: encouraging disabled students. General Medical Council, 2015. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/Gateways_to_the_professions_Nov_2016.pdf_68375486.pdf

5. General Medical Council . Welcomed and valued: supporting disabled learners in medical education and training. General Medical Council, 2019. https://www.gmc-uk.org/-/media/documents/welcomed-and-valued_pdf-78466923.pdf?la=en&hash=F5094C539A5F889830D51FF57CBE6A98BD016C9E

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3