Abstract
ObjectivesThe Esther Network (EN) model, a person-centred care innovation in Sweden, was adopted in Singapore to promote person-centredness and improve integration between health and social care practitioners. This realist evaluation aimed to explain its adoption and adaptation in Singapore.DesignAn organisational case study using a realist evaluation approach drawing on Greenhalghet al(2004)’s Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organisations to guide data collection and analysis. Data collection included interviews with seven individuals and three focus groups (including stakeholders from the macrosystem, mesosystem and microsystem levels) about their experiences of EN in Singapore, and field notes from participant observations of EN activities.SettingSingHealth, a healthcare cluster serving a population of 1.37 million residents in Eastern Singapore.ParticipantsPolicy makers (n=4), EN programme implementers (n=3), practitioners (n=6) and service users (n=7) participated in individual interviews or focus group discussions.Primary and secondary outcome measuresOutcome data from healthcare institutions (n=13) and community agencies (n=59) were included in document analysis.ResultsSingapore’s ageing population and need to transition from a hospital-based model to a more sustainable community-based model provided an opportunity for change. The personalised nature and logic of the EN model resonated with leaders and led to collective adoption. Embedded cultural influences such as the need for order and hierarchical structures were both barriers to, and facilitators of, change. Coproduction between service users and practitioners in making care improvements deepened the relationships and commitments that held the network together.ConclusionsThe enabling role of leaders (macrosystem level), the bridging role of practitioners (mesosystem level) and the unifying role of service users (microsystem level) all contributed to EN’s success in Singapore. Understanding these roles helps us understand how staff at various levels can contribute to the adoption and adaptation of EN and similar complex innovations systemwide.
Funder
FY2019 Singapore General Hospital Scholarship
Lee Kuan Yew Scholarship Fund
SingHealth Talent Development Fund Scholarship FY2019
Reference54 articles.
1. Co-Production and the co-creation of value in public services: a suitable case for treatment?;Osborne;Public Management Review,2016
2. Nelson EC , Batalden PB , Godfrey MM . Quality by design: a clinical microsystems approach. 1st ed.. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2007.
3. World Health Organisation . Who global strategy on integrated people-centred health services 2016-2026. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/180984/WHO_HIS_SDS_2015.20_eng.pdf?sequence=1 [Accessed 17 Nov 2021].
4. Person-Centered Care — Ready for Prime Time
5. "Same same or different?" A review of reviews of person-centered and patient-centered care;Håkansson Eklund;Patient Educ Couns,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献