Evaluation of parent and youth experiences in advisory groups as part of a mental healthcare clinical trial: protocol for a mixed-method study

Author:

Rasiah JananeeORCID,Freedman StephenORCID,Macdonald Lee,Prisnie Kassi,Eltorki MohamedORCID,Finkelstein Yaron,Hopkin Gareth,Santana Maria-JoseORCID,Thull-Freedman Jennifer,Stang Antonia,Prebeg Matthew,Gagnon Isabelle J,Steele Margaret,Mater Ahmed,Katz Laurence,Greenfield Brian,Plotnick Laurie,Monga Suneeta,Lipman Ellen Louise,Wright Bruce,Dimitropoulos Gina,Porter Robert,Hurley Katrina,Al Hamarneh Yazid NORCID,Newton AmandaORCID

Abstract

IntroductionPatient engagement in healthcare research is a necessity to ensure that research objectives align with priorities, outcomes and needs of the population under study, and to facilitate ease of implementation and adoption of findings. In clinical trials, there is an increasing focus on patient engagement during the planning and conduct of clinical trials due to the potential for ethical and methodological benefits. As patient engagement in clinical trials increases, there is a need to evaluate the approaches of these activities to contribute evidence on what is most appropriate and successful. The purpose of this study is to evaluate patient engagement processes and the activities of patient partners during and after a paediatric mental healthcare trial.Methods and analysisUsing a mixed-methods study design, we will evaluate patient partners’ engagement activities across set time-points during the trial and after trial completion. In this study, the term ‘patient partner’ is inclusive of two groups of people with lived experience: (1) caregivers (parents, formal/informal caregivers and family), and (2) youth (aged 15–24 years). Engagement will be evaluated using the participant and project questionnaires of the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET), followed sequentially by semi-structured interviews. Quantitative data from the PPEET questionnaire will be analysed and reported using descriptive statistics. Data from open-ended questions from the PPEET questionnaires and semi-structured interviews will be analysed using thematic analysis.Ethics and disseminationApproval from Athabasca University Research Ethics Board will be obtained for this project. Findings will be disseminated at both academic and public venues whether in-person or online, and using platforms that are caregiver and youth friendly.Trial registration numberNCT04902391.

Funder

Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. Evaluating patient and public involvement in research

2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research . Patient engagement framework Strategy for Patient Oriented Research. Ottawa CIHR; 2014.

3. Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centered outcomes research institute

4. Operationalising a model framework for consumer and community participation in health and medical research

5. Staley K . Exploring Impactimpact:Publicpublic involvement in NHS, public health and social care research; 2009.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3