Effects and utility of an online forward triage tool during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: a mixed method study and patient perspectives, Switzerland

Author:

Michel JanetORCID,Mettler Annette,Stuber RaphaelORCID,Müller Martin,Ricklin Meret E,Jent PhilippORCID,Hautz Wolf EORCID,Sauter Thomas CORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo assess the effects (quantitatively) and the utility (qualitatively) of a COVID-19 online forward triage tool (OFTT) in a pandemic context.DesignA mixed method sequential explanatory study was employed. Quantitative data of all OFTT users, between 2 March 2020 and 12 May 2020, were collected. Second, qualitative data were collected through key informant interviews (n=19) to explain the quantitative findings, explore tool utility, user experience and elicit recommendations.SettingThe working group e-emergency medicine at the emergency department developed an OFTT, which was made available online.ParticipantsParticipants included all users above the age of 18 that used the OFTT between 2 March 2020 and 12 May 2020.InterventionAn OFTT that displayed the current test recommendations of the Federal Office of Public Health on whether someone needed testing for COVID-19 or not. No diagnosis was provided.ResultsIn the study period, 6272 users consulted our OFTT; 40.2% (1626/4049) would have contacted a healthcare provider had the tool not existed. 560 participants consented to a follow-up survey and provided a valid email address. 31.4% (176/560) participants returned a complete follow-up questionnaire. 84.7% (149/176) followed the recommendations given. 41.5% (73/176) reported that their fear was allayed after using the tool. Qualitatively, seven overarching themes emerged namely (1) accessibility of tool, (2) user-friendliness of tool, (3) utility of tool as an information source, (4) utility of tool in allaying fear and anxiety, (5) utility of tool in medical decision-making (6) utility of tool in reducing the potential for onward transmissions and (7) utility of tool in reducing health system burden.ConclusionOur findings demonstrated that a COVID-19 OFTT does not only reduce the health system burden but can also serve as an information source, reduce anxiety and fear, reduce potential for cross infections and facilitate medical decision-making.

Funder

Swiss National Science Foundation

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Higgins-Dunn N . Coronavirus cases surpass 25 million as pandemic strains nations around the world. CNBC. Published August 30, 2020. Available: https://www.cnbc.com/2020/08/30/global-coronavirus-cases-surpass-25-million-as-pandemic-strains-nations-around-the-world.html [Accessed 31 Aug 2020].

2. Switzerland Coronavirus: 42,393 Cases and 2,010 Deaths - Worldometer. Available: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/switzerland/ [Accessed 01 Sep 2020].

3. Germany Coronavirus: 244,792 Cases and 9,371 Deaths - Worldometer. Available: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/germany/[Accessed 01 Sep 2020].

4. United Kingdom Coronavirus: 335,873 Cases and 41,501 Deaths - Worldometer. Available: https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/country/uk/[Accessed 01 Sep 2020].

5. Munsch N , Martin A , Gruarin S , et al . A benchmark of online COVID-19 symptom Checkers. Health Informatics 2020.doi:10.1101/2020.05.22.20109777

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3