Abstract
ObjectivesTo compare the efficacy of a traditional cock-up splint, which supports the wrist only, with a modified splint that supports the wrist and the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints of the medial four digits in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS).DesignAn assessor-blind randomised controlled trial.SettingHospital-based hand therapy clinics.ParticipantsFifty-nine adults with mild-to-moderate CTS were randomly assigned to wear a wrist splint (control group) or an MCP splint (intervention group) for 6 weeks.Outcome measuresThe standardised outcome measures used included grip and pinch strength, the static two-point discrimination test, Phalen’s manoeuvre test, Tinel’s sign and the Boston CTS Questionnaire.ResultsBoth groups improved significantly from splint use in some clinical features. The wrist splint and the MCP splint groups had significant improvements in lateral pinch strength (p=0.032 and p=0.002, respectively), two-point discrimination of the thumb (p=0.003 and p=0.041, respectively), two-point discrimination of the index (p=0.035 and p=0.023, respectively) and the Phalen’s manoeuvre symptoms (p=0.025 and p=0.002, respectively). The MCP splint group had additional improvements over the wrist splint group in tip pinch (p=0.012) and Palmar pinch (p=0.011) strength.ConclusionSplinting is a practical and effective intervention option for improving the symptoms of CTS. A wrist splint that incorporates the MCP joints is more effective than the traditional wrist-only splint, with long-lasting improvements that remained consistent after 6 months of the splint intervention. Using the more effective MCP splint may consequently reduce disability, facilitate return to work and lower the associated costs.Trial registration numberISRCTN13189602.
Reference35 articles.
1. The direct and indirect costs to society of Carpal tunnel release;Gabrielli;Hand,2020
2. United States Department of Labor BoLS . Nonfatal occupational injuries and illnesses requiring days away from work. 2015. Available: https://www.bls.gov/news.release/osh2.nr0.htm
3. Confirmatory factor analysis of the Boston Carpal tunnel questionnaire;Lue;J Occup Rehabil,2015
4. Carpal tunnel syndrome: state-of-the-art review;Osiak;Folia Morphol,2022
5. A systematic review of conservative treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献