Factors that influence patient preferences for virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting: a qualitative study

Author:

Gilbert Anthony WORCID,Jones Jeremy,Stokes MariaORCID,May Carl RORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo identify, characterise and explain factors that influence patient preferences, from the perspective of patients and clinicians, for virtual consultations in an orthopaedic rehabilitation setting.DesignQualitative study using semi-structured interviews and abductive analysis.SettingA physiotherapy and occupational therapy department situated within a tertiary orthopaedic centre in the UK.ParticipantsPatients who were receiving orthopaedic rehabilitation for a musculoskeletal problem. Occupational therapists, physiotherapists or therapy technicians involved in the delivery of orthopaedic rehabilitation for patients with a musculoskeletal problem.ResultsTwenty-two patients and 22 healthcare professionals were interviewed. The average interview length was 48 minutes. Four major factors were found to influence preference: the situation of care (the ways that patients understand and explain their clinical status, their treatment requirements and the care pathway), the expectations of care (influenced by a patients desire for contact, psychological status, previous care and perceived requirements), the demands on the patient (due to each patients respective social situation and the consequences of choice) and the capacity to allocate resources to care (these include financial, infrastructural, social and healthcare resources).ConclusionThis study has identified key factors that appear to influence patient preference for virtual consultations in orthopaedic rehabilitation. A conceptual model of these factors, derived from empirical data, has been developed highlighting how they combine and compete. A series of questions, based on these factors, have been developed to support identification of preferences in a clinical setting.

Funder

National Institute for Health Research

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. Health BCMo . Primary and community care in bc: a strategic policy framework, 2015. Available: https://www.health.gov.bc.ca/library/publications/year/2015/primary-and-community-care-policy-paper.pdf [Accessed 28 Feb 2020].

2. Australia GUT . Program guidelines: financial incentives for telehealth, 2012. Available: https://gp2u.com.au/static/documents/Telehealth_Program_Guidelines_effective_1_July_2012.pdf [Accessed 28 Feb 2020].

3. NHS . The NHS long term plan 2019.

4. Redirecting innovation in U.S. health care: options to decrease spending and increase value;Garber;Rand Health Q,2014

5. Mahendradhata Y , Trisnantoro L , Listyadewi S . The Republic of Indonesia health system review: health systems in transition, 2017. Available: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254716/9789290225164-eng.pdf;sequence=1]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/254716/9789290225164-eng.pdf [Accessed 16 Dec 2019].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3