Abstract
BackgroundPrevalence of people with multimorbidity rises. Multimorbidity constitutes a challenge to the healthcare system, and treatment of patients with multimorbidity is prone to high-quality variations. Currently, no set of quality indicators (QIs) exists to assess quality of care, let alone incorporating the patient perspective. We therefore aim to identify aspects of quality of care relevant to the patients’ perspective and match them to a literature-based set of QIs.MethodsWe conducted eight focus groups with patients with multimorbidity and three focus groups with patients’ relatives using a semistructured guide. Data were analysed using Kuckartz’s qualitative content analysis. We derived deductive categories from the literature, added inductive categories (new quality aspects) and translated them into QI.ResultsWe created four new QIs based on the quality aspects relevant to patients/relatives. Two QIs (patient education/self-management, regular updates of medication plans) were consented by an expert panel, while two others were not (periodical check-ups, general practitioner-coordinated care). Half of the literature-based QIs, for example, assessment of biopsychosocial support needs, were supported by participants’ accounts, while more technical domains regarding assessment and treatment regimens were not addressed in the focus groups.ConclusionWe show that focus groups with patients and relatives adding relevant aspects in QI development should be incorporated by default in QI development processes and constitute a reasonable addition to traditional QI development. Our QI set constitutes a framework for assessing the quality of care in the German healthcare system. It will facilitate implementation of treatment standards and increase the use of existing guidelines, hereby helping to reduce overuse, underuse and misuse of healthcare resources in the treatment of patients with multimorbidity.Trial registration numberGerman clinical trials registry (DRKS00015718), Pre-Results.
Funder
Innovation Fund of the Federal Joint Committee
Reference51 articles.
1. Advisory Council on the Assessment of Developments in the Health Care System [Sachverständigenrat zur Begutachtung der Entwicklung im Gesundheitswesen] . Special Report 2009. Coordination and Integration - Health Care in an Aging Society. [Sondergutachten 2009. Koordination und Integration - Gesundheitsversorgung in einer Gesellschaft des längeren Lebens.]. Available: https://www.svr-gesundheit.de/fileadmin/Gutachten/Sondergutachten_2009/Kurzfassung_engl_2009.pdf [Accessed 13 Apr 2021].
2. Aging with multimorbidity: A systematic review of the literature
3. Multimorbidity in primary care: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies
4. Causes and consequences of comorbidity
5. 'Potentially inappropriate or specifically appropriate?' Qualitative evaluation of general practitioners views on prescribing, polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in older people;Clyne;BMC Fam Pract,2016
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献