How do general practices respond to a pandemic? Protocol for a prospective qualitative study of six Australian practices

Author:

Russell GrantORCID,Advocat Jenny,Lane Riki,Neil Jennifer,Staunton-Smith Timothy,Alexander Karyn E,Hattle Simon,Crabtree Benjamin F,Miller William L,Setunge Sumudu NeilyaORCID,Sturgiss Elizabeth AnnORCID

Abstract

IntroductionThe COVID-19 pandemic has transformed healthcare systems worldwide. Primary care providers have been at the forefront of the pandemic response and have needed to rapidly adjust processes and routines around service delivery. The pandemic provides a unique opportunity to understand how general practices prepare for and respond to public health emergencies. We will follow a range of general practices to characterise the changes to, and factors influencing, modifications to clinical and organisational routines within Australian general practices amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods and analysisThis is a prospective case study of multiple general practices using a participatory approach for design, data collection and analysis. The study is informed by the sociological concept of routines and will be set in six general practices in Melbourne, Australia during the 2020–2021 COVID-19 pandemic. General practitioners associated with the Monash University Department of General Practice will act as investigators who will shape the project and contribute to the data collection and analysis. The data will include investigator diaries, an observation template and interviews with practice staff and investigators. Data will first be analysed by two external researchers using a constant comparative approach and then later refined at regular investigator meetings. Cross-case analysis will explain the implementation, uptake and sustainability of routine changes that followed the commencement of the pandemic.Ethics and disseminationEthics approval was granted by Monash University (23950) Human Research Ethics Committees. Practice reports will be made available to all participating practices both during the data analysis process and at the end of the study. Further dissemination will occur via publications and presentations to practice staff and medical practitioners.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. Newsroom WHO . COVID-19 significantly impacts health services for noncommunicable diseases, 2020. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/01-06-2020-covid-19-significantly-impacts-health-services-for-noncommunicable-diseases

2. After the first wave: What effects did the COVID-19 measures have on regular care and how can general practitioners respond to this?

3. Kidd M . Australia’s primary care COVID-19 response. Aust J Gen Pract 2020;49.doi:10.31128/AJGP-COVID-02

4. WHO . Coronavirus (COVID-19) current situation and case numbers. 2020 13/9/20. contract No.: 14/9/20, 2020

5. AHPRA . AHPRA returns over 40,000 health practitioners to the temporary pandemic response sub-register to support our critical health workforce during the emergency. Australian Health Practitioners Regulation Agency, 2020.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3