Delivering screening programmes in primary care: protocol for a scoping and systematic mixed studies review

Author:

Modi Rakesh NarendraORCID,Kelly Sarah,Hoare SarahORCID,Powell Alison,Kuhn Isla,Usher-Smith JulietORCID,Mant Jonathan,Burt Jenni

Abstract

IntroductionScreening programmes represent a considerable amount of healthcare activity. As complex interventions, they require careful delivery to generate net benefit. Much screening work occurs in primary care. Despite intensive study of intervention delivery in primary care, there is currently no synthesis of the delivery of screening programmes in this setting. The purpose of this review is to describe and critically evaluate the delivery of screening programmes in general practice and community services.Methods and analysisWe will use scoping review methods to explore which components of screening programmes are delivered in primary care and systematic review methods to locate and synthesise evidence on how screening programmes can be delivered in primary care, including barriers, facilitators and strategies. We will include empirical studies of any design which consider screening programmes in high-income countries, based in part or whole in primary care. We will search 20 information sources from 1 January 2000, including those relating to health (eg, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL), management (eg, Rx for change database) and grey literature (eg, OpenGrey, screening committee websites). Two reviewers will screen citations and full texts of potentially eligible studies and assess these against inclusion criteria. Qualitative and quantitative data will be extracted in duplicate and synthesised using a best fit framework approach. Within the systematic review, the mixed methods appraisal tool will be used to assess risk of bias.Ethics and disseminationNo ethics approval is required. We will disseminate findings to academics through publication and presentation, to decision-makers through national screening bodies, to practitioners through professional bodies, and to the public through social media.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020215420.

Funder

Programme Grants for Applied Research

Wellcome Trust

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference61 articles.

1. World Health Organization . Screening. World Health Organization, 2019. https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosis-screening/screening/en/

2. Public Health England . NHS population screening explained, 2013. Available: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/nhs-population-screening-explained [Accessed 16 Dec 2019].

3. Raffle AE , Mackie A , Gray JAM . Screening: evidence and practice. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019: 14–15.

4. Public Health England . NHS screening programmes in England. Public Health England, 2016.

5. Office for National Statistics . Population estimates for the UK, England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland: mid-2015. Office for National Statistics, 2016. https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/populationandmigration/populationestimates/bulletins/annualmidyearpopulationestimates/mid2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3