Author:
Elsey Helen,Poudel Ak Narayan,Ensor Tim,Mirzoev Tolib,Newell James Nicholas,Hicks Joseph Paul,Cartwright Christopher,Wong David,Tait Caroline,Baral Sushil,Bhattarai Radheshyam,Khanal Sudeepa,Dhungel Rajeev,Gajurel Subash,Manandhar Shraddha,Mashreky Saidur,Ferdoush Junnatul,Huque Rumana,Ferdous Tarana,Nasreen Shammi,Van Minh Hoang,Duc Duong Minh,Ngoc Bao,Thomson Dana,Wallace Hilary
Abstract
IntroductionAs rapid urbanisation transforms the sociodemographic structures within cities, standard survey methods, which have remained unchanged for many years, under-represent the urban poorest. This leads to an overly positive picture of urban health, distorting appropriate allocation of resources between rural and urban and within urban areas. Here, we present a protocol for our study which (i) tests novel methods to improve representation of urban populations in household surveys and measure mental health and injuries, (ii) explores urban poverty and compares measures of poverty and ‘slumness’ and (iii) works with city authorities to understand, and potentially improve, utilisation of data on urban health for planning more equitable services.Methods and analysisWe will conduct household surveys in Kathmandu, Hanoi and Dhaka to test novel methods: (i) gridded population sampling; (ii) enumeration using open-access online maps and (iii) one-stage versus two-stage cluster sampling. We will test reliability of an observational tool to categorise neighbourhoods as slum areas. Within the survey, we will assess the appropriateness of a short set of questions to measure depression and injuries. Questionnaire data will also be used to compare asset-based, consumption-based and income-based measures of poverty. Participatory methods will identify perceptions of wealth in two communities in each city. The analysis will combine quantitative and qualitative findings to recommend appropriate measures of poverty in urban areas. We will conduct qualitative interviews and establish communities of practice with government staff in each city on use of data for planning. Framework approach will be used to analyse qualitative data allowing comparison across city settings.Ethics and disseminationEthical approvals have been granted by ethics committees from the UK, Nepal, Bangladesh and Vietnam. Findings will be disseminated through conference papers, peer-reviewed open access articles and workshops with policy-makers and survey experts in Kathmandu, Hanoi and Dhaka.
Funder
Medical Research Council (MRC) Global Challenges Research Fund
Reference86 articles.
1. DHS. DHS Program, Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). https://www.dhsprogram.com/
2. WHO. STEPWise Approach to Surveillance (STEPS). http://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/en/
3. HDX. The humanitarian data exchange. https://data.humdata.org/
4. WHO. Global adult tobacco survey. http://www.who.int/tobacco/publications/surveillance/gatstlas/en/
5. UNICEF. Multiple indicator cluster survey. http://mics.unicef.org/
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献