Improving household surveys and use of data to address health inequities in three Asian cities: protocol for the Surveys for Urban Equity (SUE) mixed methods and feasibility study

Author:

Elsey Helen,Poudel Ak Narayan,Ensor Tim,Mirzoev Tolib,Newell James Nicholas,Hicks Joseph Paul,Cartwright Christopher,Wong David,Tait Caroline,Baral Sushil,Bhattarai Radheshyam,Khanal Sudeepa,Dhungel Rajeev,Gajurel Subash,Manandhar Shraddha,Mashreky Saidur,Ferdoush Junnatul,Huque Rumana,Ferdous Tarana,Nasreen Shammi,Van Minh Hoang,Duc Duong Minh,Ngoc Bao,Thomson Dana,Wallace Hilary

Abstract

IntroductionAs rapid urbanisation transforms the sociodemographic structures within cities, standard survey methods, which have remained unchanged for many years, under-represent the urban poorest. This leads to an overly positive picture of urban health, distorting appropriate allocation of resources between rural and urban and within urban areas. Here, we present a protocol for our study which (i) tests novel methods to improve representation of urban populations in household surveys and measure mental health and injuries, (ii) explores urban poverty and compares measures of poverty and ‘slumness’ and (iii) works with city authorities to understand, and potentially improve, utilisation of data on urban health for planning more equitable services.Methods and analysisWe will conduct household surveys in Kathmandu, Hanoi and Dhaka to test novel methods: (i) gridded population sampling; (ii) enumeration using open-access online maps and (iii) one-stage versus two-stage cluster sampling. We will test reliability of an observational tool to categorise neighbourhoods as slum areas. Within the survey, we will assess the appropriateness of a short set of questions to measure depression and injuries. Questionnaire data will also be used to compare asset-based, consumption-based and income-based measures of poverty. Participatory methods will identify perceptions of wealth in two communities in each city. The analysis will combine quantitative and qualitative findings to recommend appropriate measures of poverty in urban areas. We will conduct qualitative interviews and establish communities of practice with government staff in each city on use of data for planning. Framework approach will be used to analyse qualitative data allowing comparison across city settings.Ethics and disseminationEthical approvals have been granted by ethics committees from the UK, Nepal, Bangladesh and Vietnam. Findings will be disseminated through conference papers, peer-reviewed open access articles and workshops with policy-makers and survey experts in Kathmandu, Hanoi and Dhaka.

Funder

Medical Research Council (MRC) Global Challenges Research Fund

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference86 articles.

1. DHS. DHS Program, Demographic and Health Survey (DHS). https://www.dhsprogram.com/

2. WHO. STEPWise Approach to Surveillance (STEPS). http://www.who.int/ncds/surveillance/steps/en/

3. HDX. The humanitarian data exchange. https://data.humdata.org/

4. WHO. Global adult tobacco survey. http://www.who.int/tobacco/publications/surveillance/gatstlas/en/

5. UNICEF. Multiple indicator cluster survey. http://mics.unicef.org/

Cited by 12 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3