Mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external assessment: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

Author:

Hovlid EinarORCID,Braut Geir Sverre,Hannisdal Einar,Walshe Kieran,Bukve Oddbjørn,Flottorp Signe,Stensland Per,Frich Jan C

Abstract

ObjectivesExternal inspections are widely used to improve the quality of care. The effects of inspections remain unclear and little is known about how they may work. We conducted a narrative synthesis of research literature to identify mediators of change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspections.MethodsWe performed a literature search (1980–January 2020) to identify empirical studies addressing change in healthcare organisations subject to external inspection. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, we performed a narrative synthesis to identify mediators of change.ResultsWe included 95 studies. Accreditation was the most frequent type of inspection (n=68), followed by statutory inspections (n=19), and external peer review (n=9). Our findings suggest that the regulatory context in which the inspections take place affect how they are acted on by those being inspected. The way inspections are conducted seem to be critical for how the inspection findings are perceived and followed up. Inspections can engage and involve staff, facilitate leader engagement, improve communication and enable the creation of new networks for reflection on clinical practice. Inspections can contribute to creating an awareness of the inspected organisation’s current practice and performance gaps, and a commitment to change. Moreover, they can contribute to facilitating the planning and implementation of change, as well as self-evaluation and the use of data to evaluate performance.ConclusionsExternal inspections can affect different mediators of organisational change. The way and to what extent they do depend on a range of factors related to the outer setting, the way inspections are conducted and how they are perceived and acted on by the inspected organisation. To improve the quality of care, the organisational change processes need to involve and impact the way care is delivered to the patients.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference131 articles.

1. Walshe K , Boyd A . Designing regulation: a review. Machester: The University of Manchester - Manchester Business School, 2007.

2. Profiling health-care accreditation organizations: an international survey

3. Shaw C , Groene O , Berger E , et al . External institutional strategies: accreditation, certification, supervision. In: Busse R , Klazinga N , Panteli D , et al , eds. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies. Copenhagen, Denmark: European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2019.

4. Walshe K . Clinical governance: from policy to practice. Birminhgam: Health Services Management Centre, University of Birmingham, 2000.

5. Walshe K , Phipps D . Developing a strategic framework to guide the care quality commission’s programme of evaluation. Manchester: University of Manchester - Manchester Business School, 2013.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3