Inequalities in lifespan and mortality risk in the US, 2015–2019: a cross-sectional analysis of subpopulations by social determinants of health

Author:

Bergeron-Boucher Marie-PierORCID,Callaway JuliaORCID,Strozza CosmoORCID,Oeppen Jim

Abstract

ObjectiveTo quantify inequalities in lifespan across multiple social determinants of health, how they act in tandem with one another, and to create a scoring system that can accurately identify subgroups of the population at high risk of mortality.DesignComparison of life tables across 54 subpopulations defined by combinations of four social determinants of health: sex, marital status, education and race, using data from the Multiple Cause of Death dataset and the American Community Survey.SettingUnited States, 2015–2019.Main outcome measuresWe compared the partial life expectancies (PLEs) between age 30 and 90 years of all subpopulations. We also developed a scoring system to identify subgroups at high risk of mortality.ResultsThere is an 18.0-year difference between the subpopulations with the lowest and highest PLE. Differences in PLE between subpopulations are not significant in most pairwise comparisons. We visually illustrate how the PLE changes across social determinants of health. There is a complex interaction among social determinants of health, with no single determinant fully explaining the observed variation in lifespan. The proposed scoring system adds clarification to this interaction by yielding a single score that can be used to identify subgroups that might be at high risk of mortality. A similar scoring system by cause of death was also created to identify which subgroups could be considered at high risk of mortality from specific causes. Even if subgroups have similar mortality levels, they are often subject to different cause-specific mortality risks.ConclusionsHaving one characteristic associated with higher mortality is often not sufficient to be considered at high risk of mortality, but the risk increases with the number of such characteristics. Reducing inequalities is vital for societies, and better identifying individuals and subgroups at high risk of mortality is necessary for public health policy.

Funder

European Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3