Real-time monitoring and feedback to improve shared decision-making for surgery (the ALPACA Study): protocol for a mixed-methods study to inform co-development of an inclusive intervention

Author:

Hoffmann ChristinORCID,Avery Kerry N LORCID,Macefield Rhiannon CORCID,Snelgrove Val,Blazeby Jane MORCID,Hopkins Della,Hickey Shireen,Cabral Christie,Hall JenniferORCID,Gibbison BenORCID,Rooshenas Leila,Williams Adam,Aning Jonathan,Bekker Hilary L,McNair Angus G KORCID

Abstract

IntroductionHigh-quality shared decision-making (SDM) is a priority of health services, but only achieved in a minority of surgical consultations. Improving SDM for surgical patients may lead to more effective care and moderate the impact of treatment consequences. There is a need to establish effective ways to achieve sustained and large-scale improvements in SDM for all patients whatever their background. The ALPACA Study aims to develop, pilot and evaluate a decision support intervention that uses real-time feedback of patients’ experience of SDM to change patients’ and healthcare professionals’ decision-making processes before adult elective surgery and to improve patient and health service outcomes.Methods and analysisThis protocol outlines a mixed-methods study, involving diverse stakeholders (adult patients, healthcare professionals, members of the community) and three National Health Service (NHS) trusts in England. Detailed methods for the assessment of the feasibility, usability and stakeholder views of implementing a novel system to monitor the SDM process for surgery automatically and in real time are described. The study will measure the SDM process using validated instruments (CollaboRATE, SDM-Q-9, SHARED-Q10) and will conduct semi-structured interviews and focus groups to examine (1) the feasibility of automated data collection, (2) the usability of the novel system and (3) the views of diverse stakeholders to inform the use of the system to improve SDM. Future phases of this work will complete the development and evaluation of the intervention.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval was granted by the NHS Health Research Authority North West-Liverpool Central Research Ethics Committee (reference: 21/PR/0345). Approval was also granted by North Bristol NHS Trust to undertake quality improvement work (reference: Q80008) overseen by the Consent and SDM Programme Board and reporting to an Executive Assurance Committee.Trial registration numberISRCTN17951423; Pre-results.

Funder

NIHR Biomedical Research Centre

NIHR

NIHR Programme Development Grants

Weston NHS Foundation Trust

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference60 articles.

1. Bomhof-Roordink H , Gärtner FR , Stiggelbout AM , et al . Key components of shared decision making models: a systematic review. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031763. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031763

2. Department of Health and Social Care . The NHS Constitution for England. 2021. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-nhs-constitution-for-england/the-nhs-constitution-for-england#introduction-to-the-nhs-constitution [Accessed 15 Sep 2022].

3. National Health Service . The NHS long term plan (published online first). 2019. Available: www.longtermplan.nhs.uk [Accessed 15 Sep 2022].

4. Archive BLUW . Health and social care act 2012 - NHS reforms. 2013. Available: https://www.webarchive.org.uk/en/ukwa/collection/9 [Accessed 11 May 2023].

5. Royal College of Surgeons . Good surgical practice. 2013. Available: https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/standards-and-research/gsp/ [Accessed 15 Sep 2022].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3