Abstract
ObjectiveInfants enter care at varying rates across local authorities (LAs) in England, but evidence is lacking on what is driving these differences. With this ecological study, we aimed to explore the extent to which adversity indicated within women’s hospitalisation histories, predelivery, explained the rate of infant entry into care.MethodsWe used two longitudinal person-level data sets on hospitalisations and entries to care to create annual measures for 131 English LAs, between 2006/2007 and 2013/2014 (April–March). We combined these measures by LA and financial year, along with other publicly available data on LA characteristics. We used linear mixed-effects models to analyse the relationship between the outcome—LA-specific rate of infant entry into care (per 10 000 infants in the LA population) — and LA-specific percentage of live births with maternal history of adversity-related hospital admissions (ie, substance misuse, mental health problems or violence-related admissions in the 3 years before delivery), adjusted for other predictors of entry into care.ResultsRate of infant entry into care (mean: 85.16 per 10 000, SD: 41.07) and percentage of live births with maternal history of adversity-related hospital admissions (4.62%, 2.44%) varied greatly by LA. The prevalence of maternal adversity accounted for 24% of the variation in rate of entry (95% CI 14% to 35%). After adjustment, a percentage point increase in prevalence of maternal adversity—both within and between LAs—was associated with an estimated 2.56 (per 10 000) more infants entering care (1.31–3.82).ConclusionsThe prevalence of maternal adversity before birth helped to explain the variation in LA rates of infant entry into care. Preventive interventions are needed to improve maternal well-being before and during pregnancy, and potentially reduce risk of child maltreatment and therefore entries to care. Evidence on who to target and data to evaluate change require linkage between parent–child healthcare data and administrative data from children’s social care.
Funder
National Institute for Health Research
Medical Research Council
Nuffield Foundation
Reference49 articles.
1. Department for Education . Statistics: looked-after children, 2019. Available: https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/statistics-looked-after-children [Accessed 26 Sep 2019].
2. Family Rights Group . Care crisis review: options for change, 2018. Available: https://www.frg.org.uk/images/Care_Crisis/CCR-FINAL.pdf [Accessed 1 Oct 2019].
3. Oranga Tamariki . Babies and children entering Oranga Tamariki care, 2019. Available: https://www.orangatamariki.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/OIA-responses/children-in-care/20190628-Babies-and-children-entering-Oranga-Tamariki-care.pdf [Accessed 17 Oct 2019].
4. Woods R , Henderson G . Changes in out of home care and permanence planning among young children in Scotland, 2003 to 2017. Adopt Foster 2018.
5. Characteristics and outcomes of newborns entered who entered into care (EIC) within 7 days of birth in NSW, Australia;Marsh;Child Youth Serv Rev,2017
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献