Systematic review of qualitative studies on participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly

Author:

Serrano-Gemes GemaORCID,Rich-Ruiz ManuelORCID,Serrano-del-Rosal RafaelORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesTo understand who are the participants in the decision-making process about the location of care of the elderly.DesignSystematic review of qualitative studies.Data sourcesThe following databases were consulted: Web of Science, MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and SciELO (from the beginning until 29 November 2017). The bibliographical references in the studies that were finally included in the review were also searched.Study selectionThe studies had to deal with the decision-making process (already experienced by the participants) on the location of care of the elderly (adults who are 65 or older), had to use a qualitative methodology and had to be written in English or Spanish.Data extraction and synthesisA data extraction tool was used. Data analysis was conducted through the constant comparative method from Glaser and Strauss’ grounded theory.Results46 studies were included in this review. Most of them were carried out in the USA, and in 21 of them the study population focused exclusively on the elderly. This review has found that there are many participants, with different roles and degrees of involvement, who may act jointly, separately or sequentially. These participants may be: the elders, family members, professionals and other relevant.ConclusionsThe main result of this review has been the variability found on how this decision is made, even varying the way of acting/perceiving the situation of the involved persons on certain occasions, simply due to the influence of some of the other groups of participants studied. Besides, this review has focused its results on the main participant in this process, the elders and how their family members interact with them when it comes to making this decision. This has allowed relevant results to be obtained about roles and degrees of involvement.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42018084826.

Funder

Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference72 articles.

1. A mixed methods thematic review: health-related decision-making by the older person;King;J Clin Nurs,2018

2. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: What does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango)

3. Decision-making in the physician–patient encounter: revisiting the shared treatment decision-making model

4. Montori VM , Elwyn G , Devereaux P , et al . Decision making and the patient. In: Users’ Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 3ªed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2015: 547–59.

5. Twelve myths about shared decision making

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3