Cross-sectional survey of orthotic service provision in the UK: does where you live affect the service you receive?

Author:

Chockalingam NachiappanORCID,Eddison Nicola,Healy AoifeORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the quantity and quality of orthotic service provision within the UK.DesignCross-sectional survey obtained through freedom of information request in 2017.SettingNational Health Service (NHS) Trusts/Health Boards (HBs) across the UK.Main outcome measuresDescriptive statistics of survey results, including information related to finance, volume of appointments, patients and orthotic products, waiting times, staffing, complaints, outcome measures and key performance indicators.ResultsResponses were received from 61% (119/196) of contacted Trusts/HBs; 86% response rate from Scotland (12/14) and Wales (6/7), 60% (3/5) from Northern Ireland and 58% (98/170) from England. An inhouse service was provided by 32% (35/110) of responses and 68% (74/110) were funded by a block contract. Long waiting times for appointments and lead times for footwear/orthoses, and large variations in patient entitlements for orthotic products across Trusts/HBs were evident. Variations in the length of appointment times were also evident between regions of the UK and between contracted and inhouse services, with all appointment times relatively short. There was evidence of improvements in service provision; ability for direct general practitioner referral and orthotic services included within multidisciplinary clinics. However, this was not found in all Trusts/HBs.ConclusionsThe aim to provide a complete UK picture of orthotic service provision was hindered by the low response rate and limited information provided in some responses, with greater ability of Trusts/HBs to answer questions related to quantity of service than those that reflect quality. However, results highlight the large discrepancies in service provision between Trusts/HBs, the gaps in data capture and the need for the UK NHS to establish appropriate processes to record the quantity and quality of orthotic service provision. In addition to standardising appointment times across the NHS, guidelines on product entitlements for patients and their lead times should be prescribed to promote equity.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference39 articles.

1. International Committee of the Red Cross . Physical rehabilitation programme: annual report 2013, 2014. Available: https://www.icrc.org/en/publication/4209-physical-rehabilitation-programme-annual-report-2013 [Accessed 7 Nov 2018].

2. Health and Care Professions Council . Registrant snapshot - December 2018, 2019. Available: http://www.hpc-uk.org/globalassets/resources/data/2018/registrant-snapshot-20181130.pdf

3. Scotland NHS . Scottish Orthotic services review, 2005. Available: https://www.sehd.scot.nhs.uk/publications/dc20050614orthotics.pdf [Accessed 8 Nov 2018].

4. Khasnabis C . Standards for prosthetics and Orthotics service provision: 2015–2017 work plan. version 4 2015, 2015. Available: http://www.who.int/phi/implementation/assistive_technology/workplan_p-o_standards.pdf [Accessed 8 Nov 2018].

5. World Health Organization . Standards for prosthetics and Orthotics Part 1: standards. 2017. Available: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259209/9789241512480-part1-eng.pdf;jsessionid=4A15505E7D48A40246283DBF4A2DBB17?sequence=1 [Accessed 8 Nov 2018].

Cited by 9 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3