Evaluating the validity of the selection measures used for the UK’s foundation medical training programme: a national cohort study

Author:

Smith Daniel TORCID,Tiffin Paul A

Abstract

ObjectivesCurrently relative performance at medical school (educational performance measure (EPM) decile), additional educational achievements and the score on a situational judgement test (SJT) are used to rank applicants to the UK Foundation Years postgraduate medical training programme. We sought to evaluate whether these three measures were predictive of subsequent successful completion of the programme, and thus were valid selection criteria.MethodsData were obtained from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) on 14 131 UK applicants to the foundation programme starting in 2013 and 2014. These data included training outcomes in the form of Annual Reviews of Competency Progression (ARCPs), which indicated whether the programme was successfully completed. The relationship between applicants’ performance on the three selection measures to the odds of successful programme completion were modelled.ResultsOn univariable analyses, all three measures were associated with the odds of successful completion of the programme. Converting the SJT score to deciles to compare the effect sizes suggested that one decile increase in the EPM increased the odds of completing the programme by approximately 15%, whereas the equivalent value was 8% for the SJT scores. On multivariable analyses (with all three measures included in the model), these effects were only independently and statistically significant for EPM decile (OR 1.14, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.18, p<0.001) and SJT z-score decile (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.09, p=0.02).ConclusionsThe EPM decile and SJT scores may be effective selection measures for the foundation programme. However, educational achievements does not add value to the other two measures when predicting programme completion. Thus, its usefulness in this context is less clear. Moreover, our findings suggest that the weighting for the EPM decile score, relative to SJT performance, should be increased.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. UK Foundation Programme Office. The UK foundation programme office (2017). http://www.foundationprogramme.nhs.uk/pages/home/about-the-foundation-programme (accessed 19 Nov 2017).

2. ISFP Project. Medical schools council on behalf of the cross-stakeholder project group (May 2012). Improving selection to the foundation programme final report of the parallel recruitment exercise. https://isfporguk.files.wordpress.com/2017/04/final-report-of-pre-full-appendices.pdf (accessed 19 Nov 2017).

3. Patterson F , Ashworth H , Murray H , et al . Analysis of the Situational Judgement Test for Selection to the Foundation Programme 2013 Technical Report . 2013 https://isfp.org.uk/fp-technical-reports/ (accessed 19 Nov 2017).

4. Patterson F , Murray H , Baron H , et al . Analysis of the Situational Judgement Test for Selection to the Foundation Programme 2014 Technical Report. 2014 https://isfp.org.uk/fp-technical-reports/ (accessed 19 Nov 2017).

5. Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100;Patterson;Med Teach,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3