Abstract
ObjectivesTo identify approaches for an effective patient-centred care of depressed employees, we investigated occupational physicians’ (OPs) and psychotherapists’ (PTs) knowledge about job stressors on the development of depression, application of this knowledge, interdisciplinary cooperation and perceived barriers.Study designA cross-sectional online survey.ParticipantsOPs (163; 48.5% male) and PTs (69; 43.5% male) providing complete data on the survey out of 257 OPs and 112 PTs who started the survey. There have been 458 (OPs) and 821 (PTs) initial clicks.MethodsMain outcome measures were the importance ratings of specific job stressors, the frequency of asking patients about those stressors, the need for interdisciplinary cooperation, as well as perceived barriers for cooperation. We performed multivariate analysis of variance, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Spearman’s rank-order correlations.ResultsThe achieved response rate for OPs was 56.1% and for PTs 13.6%. Both disciplines agreed on the importance of job stressors regarding depression (ICC=0.90; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.98), but both ranked these factors differently from the current state of research. As to knowledge application, OPs showed positive associations between the importance of job stressors and the frequency of asking employees about them (eg, job insecurity (rs=0.20, p=0.005)) and PTs for social stressors (eg, interpersonal conflicts (rs=0.38, p=0.001)). OPs (mean=3.41) reported a higher necessity of interdisciplinary cooperation than PTs (mean=3.17; F(1,230)=7.02, p=0.009). Furthermore, cooperation was reported as difficult to implement. PTs perceived barriers (eg, time restriction) as more hindering (mean=3.2) than OPs (mean=2.8; F(1,171)=8.16, p=0.005).ConclusionsBoth disciplines are aware of the relevance of job stressors as risk factors for depression, but should be encouraged to ask employees more frequently about them. The need for interdisciplinary cooperation and possible barriers are discussed. It is crucial to emphasise the meaning of sufficient cooperation, since closing this gap for improving patient-centred care especially for employees suffering from depression is necessary.
Reference45 articles.
1. Health problems and psychosocial work environment as predictors of long term sickness absence in employees who visited the occupational physician and/or general practitioner in relation to work: a prospective study
2. Federal Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs [Bundesministerium für Arbeit und Soziales]. Occupational Medicine. Mental Health at Work – Occupational Recommendation [Arbeitsmedizin. Psychische Gesundheit im Betrieb – Arbeitsmedizinische Empfehlung]. Bonn, Germany: Hausdruckerei BMAS 2016. http://www.bmas.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/PDF-Publikationen/a450-psychische-gesundheit-im-betrieb.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (accessed 25 Aug 2017).
3. The World Bank. Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15+). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SL.TLF.CACT.ZS?name_desc=false (access 27 Nov 2017).
4. Robert-Koch-Institut. Health in Germany - Federal health monitoring jointly supported by RKI and Destatis [Gesundheit in Deutschland – Gesundheitsberichterstattung des Bundes gemeinsam getragen von RKI und Destatis]. Berlin, Germany: Heenemann Printing Press, 2015. (accessed 30 Aug 2017).
5. Federal Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [Bundesagentur für Arbeitsschutz und Arbeitsmedizin]. Economic costs due to disability 2014 [Volkswirtschaftliche Kosten durch Arbeitsunfähigkeit 2014]. Dortmund, Germany: 2016. https://www.baua.de/DE/Themen/Arbeitswelt-und-Arbeitsschutz-im-Wandel/Arbeitsweltberichterstattung/Kosten-der-AU/pdf/Kosten-2014.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=2 (accessed 21 Aug 2017).
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献