Abstract
ObjectivesEmergency surgical practice constitutes 50% of the workload for surgeons, but there is a lack of high quality randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in emergency surgery. This study aims to establish the differences between the registration, completion and publication of emergency and elective surgical trials.DesignThe clinicaltrials.gov and ISRCTN.com trials registry databases were searched for RCTs between 12 July 2010 and 12 July 2012 using the keyword ‘surgery’. Publications were systematically searched for in Pubmed, MEDLINE and EMBASE.ParticipantsResults with no surgical interventions were excluded. The remaining results were manually categorised into ‘emergency’ or ‘elective’ and ‘surgical’ or ‘adjunct’ by two reviewers.Primary outcome measuresNumber of RCTs registered in emergency versus elective surgery.Secondary outcome measuresNumber of RCTs published in emergency versus elective surgery; reasons why trials remain unpublished; funding, sponsorship and impact of published articles; number of adjunct trials registered in emergency and elective surgery.Results2700 randomised trials were registered. 1173 trials were on a surgical population and of these, 414 trials were studying surgery. Only 9.4% (39/414) of surgical trials were in emergency surgery. The proportion of trials successfully published did not significantly differ between emergency and elective surgery (0.46 vs 0.52; mean difference (MD) −0.06, 95% CI −0.24 to 0.12). Unpublished emergency surgical trials were statistically equally likely to be terminated early compared with elective trials (0.33 vs 0.16; MD −0.18, 95% CI −0.06 to 0.41). Low accrual accounted for a similar majority in both groups (0.43 vs 0.46; MD −0.04, 95% CI −0.48 to 0.41). Unpublished trials in both groups were statistically equally likely to still be planning publication (0.52 vs 0.71; MD −0.18, 95% CI −0.43 to 0.07).ConclusionFewer RCTs are registered in emergency than elective surgery. Once trials are registered both groups are equally likely to be published.
Reference20 articles.
1. The public health burden of emergency general surgery in the United States: a 10-year analysis of the Nationwide Inpatient Sample – 2001 to 2010;Gale;J Trauma Acute Care Surg,2014
2. RCSEng. Emergency Surgery - Standards for unscheduled surgical care, 2011. https://www.google.co.uk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiltJHc-JfXAhXBHxoKHcrzC7EQFggyMAI&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.rcseng.ac.uk%2F-%2Fmedia%2Ffiles%2Frcs%2Fabout-rcs%2Fregional%2Frcs_emergency_surgery_2011_web.pdf&usg=AOvV. (5 Oct 2017).
3. McCord C , Ozgediz D , Beard JH , et al . General Surgical Emergencies. Essential Surgery: Disease Control Priorities 2015 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26741004 (3 Jul 2017).
4. Risk associated with complications and mortality after urgent surgery vs elective and emergency surgery: implications for defining "quality" and reporting outcomes for urgent surgery;Mullen;JAMA Surg,2017
5. Predictors of surgical complications: a systematic review;Visser;Surgery,2015
Cited by
10 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献