Observational and prospective study: evaluation of beliefs and representations of chronic treatments of polymedicated patients hospitalised in a vascular medicine and surgery department

Author:

Kotry DouniaORCID,Saillard Justine,Bonsergent Marion,Volteau Christelle,Benichou Antoine,Prot-Labarthe Sonia,Huon Jean-FrançoisORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesToday, the involvement of patients in their care is essential. As the population ages increases, the number of patients with chronic diseases is increasing. In the vascular medicine and surgery departments, patients are polymedicated and mostly suffer from several chronic diseases. Approximately 50% of patients with a chronic disease are not adherent. Among the factors that can influence therapeutic adherence are the beliefs and representations of patients.To evaluate the beliefs and representations of chronic treatments in patients with multiple medications and hospitalised in a vascular medicine and surgery department, and to evaluate the medication adherence, the knowledge and the importance patients attach to their treatments.DesignObservational, prospective and a single-centre study.SettingThe study was conducted in a French tertiary hospital centre of around 3000 beds in 9 institutions.ParticipantsAdult polymedicated (ie, minimum of five chronic treatments) patients hospitalised in a vascular medicine and surgery department were included after application of the exclusion criteria.MethodsPatient interviews were carried out in the department and were based on three interviewer-administered questionnaires (a global questionnaire, the Belief Medical Questionnaire and the GIRERD questionnaire).ResultsOur study showed that patients perceived their treatments as beneficial rather than worrying. A correlation between medication adherence and beliefs was observed. ‘Non-adherent’patients had a more negative overall view of medication than ‘adherent’ patients. The level of compliance and knowledge of our patients was low. Only 11% of the patients were ‘good adherent’, 16% of the patients could perfectly name their treatment and 36% knew all the indications.ConclusionKnowledge of treatment representation and beliefs are central to understanding patient behaviour. Considering patients’ representations will allow the identification of levers, and the development of actions and educational tools adapted to improve their adherence, their knowledge and therefore their drug management.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference29 articles.

1. Chassang M , Gautier A . Les maladies chroniques [online], . 2019 Available: https://www.lecese.fr/sites/default/files/pdf/Avis/2019/2019_14_maladies_chroniques.pdf [Accessed 21 Jan 2022].

2. WHO . Noncommunicable diseases [online], Available: https://www.who.int/fr/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases [Accessed 21 Oct 2023].

3. Briançon S , Guérin G , Sandrin-Berthon B . Chronic diseases [online]. 2010.

4. Laroche JP , Guilbert B , Miserey G , et al . Conseil National Professionnel de Médecine Vasculaire, Médecine Vasculaire - Etat des lieux [online], . 2015 Available: https://www.portailvasculaire.fr/sites/default/files/docs/livre_blanc_2015.pdf [Accessed 26 Jul 2022].

5. Monégat M , Sermet C , Perronnin M , et al . La polymedication definitions mesures et enjeux [online], . 2014 Available: https://www.irdes.fr/recherche/questions-d-economie-de-la-sante/204-la-polymedication-definitions-mesures-et-enjeux.pdf [Accessed 3 Jan 2022].

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3