Occurrence of sensitive topics during ward round: an ancillary analysis of the BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial

Author:

Gross Sebastian,Becker ChristophORCID,Beck Katharina,Memma Valentina,Gaab Jens,Schütz Philipp,Leuppi Jörg D,Schaefert Rainer,Langewitz WolfORCID,Trendelenburg Marten,Breidthardt Tobias,Eckstein Jens,Osthoff Michael,Bassetti Stefano,Hunziker SabinaORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveDiscussing sensitive topics (eg, medical uncertainty, social issues, non-adherence) during ward rounds is challenging and may negatively impact patient satisfaction with the healthcare they are receiving. In the previous multicentre randomised BEDSIDE-OUTSIDE trial focusing on communication during ward rounds, we investigated the interplay between sensitive topics and low reported satisfaction with care.DesignPre-planned secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial. For this analysis data of the original trial was pooled across intervention groups.SettingThree Swiss teaching hospitals.ParticipantsAdult patients hospitalised for medical care.InterventionsWe analysed predefined sensitive health topics and specific elements of communication from audiotapes recorded during ward rounds, for both patients dealing with and without sensitive topics.Primary and secondary outcome measuresThe primary endpoint was overall patient satisfaction with care; measured on a Visual Analogue Scale from 0 to 100. Secondary endpoints included duration of ward rounds and further satisfaction outcomes.ResultsOf the 919 included patients, 474 had at least one sensitive topic including medical uncertainty (n=251), psychiatric comorbidities (n=161), tumour diagnosis (n=137) and social issues (n=125). Compared with patients without sensitive topics, patients with sensitive topics reported lower satisfaction with care (mean (SD), 87.7 (±14.6) vs 90.2 (±12.1), adjusted difference −2.5 (95% CI −4.28 to −0.72), p=0.006. Among patients with sensitive topics, risk factors for low satisfaction included several parameters concerning patient–physician interaction such as disagreements during ward rounds (mean (SD), 14/212 (6.6%) vs 41/254 (16.1%), adjusted OR 2.78 (95% CI 1.47 to 5.27), p=0.002).ConclusionsA large proportion of medical inpatients must deal with sensitive health topics. This is associated with lower satisfaction with care, particularly if the patient perceives the interaction with doctors during ward rounds as unsatisfactory. Educating physicians on specific communication techniques may help improve care for these patients.Trial registration numberNCT03210987.

Funder

Gottfried und Julia Bangerter-Rhyner-Stiftung

Forschungsrat des Kantonsspitals Aarau

Swiss Cancer Research Foundation

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3