Qualitative interview study exploring the perspectives of pregnant women on participating in controlled human infection research in the UK

Author:

Dorey Robert BORCID,Theodosiou Anastasia A,Read Robert CORCID,Vandrevala Tushna,Jones Christine E

Abstract

IntroductionPregnant women have been historically excluded from interventional research. While recent efforts have been made to improve their involvement, there remains a disparity in the evidence base for treatments available to pregnant women compared with the non-pregnant population. A significant barrier to the enrolment of pregnant women within research is risk perception and a poor understanding of decision-making in this population.ObjectiveAssess the risk perception and influences on decision-making in pregnant women, when considering whether to enrol in a hypothetical interventional research study.DesignSemistructured interviews were undertaken, and thematic analysis was undertaken of participant responses.ParticipantsTwelve pregnant women were enrolled from an antenatal outpatient clinic.ResultsParticipants were unanimously positive about enrolling in the proposed hypothetical interventional study. Risk perception was influenced by potential risks to their fetus and their previous experiences of healthcare and research. Participants found the uncertainty in quantifying risk for new research interventions challenging. They were motivated to enrol in research by altruism and found less invasive research interventions more tolerable.ConclusionIt is vital to understand how pregnant women balance the perceived risks and benefits of interventional research. This may help clinicians and scientists better communicate risk to pregnant women and address the ongoing under-representation of pregnant women in interventional research.

Funder

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Medical Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference41 articles.

1. Historical background of clinical trials involving women and minorities

2. Kachikis A , Eckert LO , Englund JA . Chapter 1 - the history of maternal immunization. In: Leuridan EE , Nunes MC , Jones CE , eds. Maternal immunization. Academic Press, 2020: 3–24. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128145821000012

3. Vulnerability of pregnant women in clinical research

4. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS)x . International ethical guidelines for health-related research involving humans. Fourth. Geneva: CIOMS publications, 2016. Available: https://cioms.ch/publications/product/international-ethical-guidelines-for-health-related-research-involving-humans/

5. Risk perception regarding drug use in pregnancy;Widnes;Am J Obstet Gynecol,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3