Implementation model for a national learning health system (IMPLEMENT-National LHS): a concept analysis and systematic review protocol

Author:

Gartner Jean-BaptisteORCID,Benharbit BoutheinaORCID,Layani GéraldineORCID,Sasseville MaximeORCID,Lemaire CéliaORCID,Bergeron Frédéric,Wilhelmy Catherine,Menear Matthew,Côté André

Abstract

IntroductionDespite efforts and repeated calls to improve the organisation and quality of healthcare and services, and in view of the many challenges facing health systems, the results and capacity to adapt and integrate innovations and new knowledge remain suboptimal. Learning health systems (LHS) may be an effective model to accelerate the application of research for real quality improvement in healthcare. However, while recognising the enormous potential of LHS, the literature suggests the model remains more of an aspiration than a reality.Methods and analysisTo reach a fine understanding of the implementation of the concepts involved in LHS, we will use a hybrid method which combines concept analyses with systematic review methodology. We will use a two-step analysis, a content analysis to analyse the definitions, uses and attributes of the concept and a systematic review to analyse the concept’s implementation mechanisms. We will search eight databases and grey literature and present a broad synthesis of the available evidence regarding design, implementation and evaluation of LHS in a multilevel perspective. We will follow the latest Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis statement for conducting and reporting a systematic review. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles and abstracts against the eligibility criteria followed by full-text screening of potentially relevant articles for final inclusion decision. Conflicts will be resolved with a senior author. We will include published primary studies that use qualitative, quantitative or mixed methods. The assessment of risk of bias will be made using the Mixed-Methods Appraisal Tool.Ethics and disseminationThis systematic review is exempt from ethics approval. The results formulated will highlight evidence-based interventions that support the implementation of a national LHS. They will be of particular interest to decision makers, researchers, managers, clinicians and patients allowing finally to implement the promising proposal of LHSs at national scale.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42023393565.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference68 articles.

1. Institute of Medicine . Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US), 2001.

2. Institute of Medicine . Committee on improving the quality of cancer care: addressing the challenges of an aging population, Board on Healthcare Services, Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2013.

3. Institute of Medicine . Delivering high-quality cancer care: charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2013.

4. Excellence en santé Canada . Un Appel À L’Action. 2021. Available: https://www.healthcareexcellence.ca/fr/actualites/un-appel-a-l-action/ [Accessed 15 Feb 2022].

5. World Health Organization . Framework on integrated, people-centered health services: Report by the Secretariat. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2016. Available: https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA69/A69_39-en.pdf

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3