Impact of an in-consult patient decision aid on treatment choices and outcomes of management for patients with an endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyp: a study protocol for a non-randomised clinical phase II study

Author:

Würtz Helene JuulORCID,Rahr Hans Bjarke,Lindebjerg Jan,Edwards AdrianORCID,Steffensen Karina Dahl

Abstract

IntroductionManagement of an endoscopically resected malignant colorectal polyps can be challenging due to the risk of residual tumour and lymphatic spread. International studies have shown, that of those choosing surgical management instead of surveillance strategy, there are between 54% and 82% of bowel resections without evidence of residual tumour or lymphatic spread. As surgical management entails risks of complications and surveillance strategy entails risks of residual tumour or recurrence, a clinical dilemma arises when choosing a management strategy. Shared decision-making is a concept that can be used in preference-sensitive decision-making to facilitate patient involvement and empowerment to facilitate active patient participation in the decision-making process.Methods and analysisThis study protocol describes our clinical multi-institutional, non-randomised, interventional phase II study at Danish surgical departments planned to commence in the second quarter of 2024. The aim of this study is to examine whether shared decision-making and using a patient decision aid in consultations affect patients’ choice of management, comparing with retrospective data. The secondary aim is to investigate patients’ experiences, perceived involvement, satisfaction, decision conflict and other outcomes using questionnaire feedback directly from the patients.Ethics and disseminationThere are no conflicts of interest for principal or local investigators in any of the study sites. All results will be published at Danish and international meetings, and in English language scientific peer-reviewed journals. Our study underwent evaluation by the Regional Committees on Health Research Ethics for Southern Denmark (file number 20232000-47), concluding that formal approval was not required for this kind of research.Trial registration numberNCT05776381.

Funder

Syddansk Universitet

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference35 articles.

1. DCCG . Annual report 2017. 2017. Available: https://dccg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/DCCG-%C3%85rsrapport-2017v2.pdf [Accessed 7 Jun 2022].

2. DCCG . Annual report 2018. 2018. Available: https://dccg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/DCCG-%C3%85rsrapport-2018.pdf [Accessed 7 Jun 2022].

3. DCCG . Clinical Basisapport 2018. 2018. Available: https://dccg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/DCCG-Klinisk-basisrapport-2018.pdf [Accessed 7 Jun 2022].

4. DCCG . Danish national guidelines: Pt1 colorectal cancer management. 2018. Available: https://dccg.dk/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/2018_Afgr%C3%A6nsning-vers-1_2-2018.pdf [Accessed 7 Jun 2022].

5. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3