Incidental findings on brain imaging and blood tests: results from the first phase of Insight 46, a prospective observational substudy of the 1946 British birth cohort

Author:

Keuss Sarah EORCID,Parker Thomas D,Lane Christopher A,Hoskote Chandrashekar,Shah Sachit,Cash David M,Keshavan Ashvini,Buchanan Sarah M,Murray-Smith Heidi,Wong Andrew,James Sarah-NaomiORCID,Lu Kirsty,Collins Jessica,Beasley Daniel GORCID,Malone Ian B,Thomas David L,Barnes Anna,Richards Marcus,Fox Nick,Schott Jonathan M

Abstract

ObjectiveTo summarise the incidental findings detected on brain imaging and blood tests during the first wave of data collection for the Insight 46 study.DesignProspective observational sub-study of a birth cohort.SettingSingle-day assessment at a research centre in London, UK.Participants502 individuals were recruited from the MRC National Survey of Health and Development (NSHD), the 1946 British birth cohort, based on pre-specified eligibility criteria; mean age was 70.7 (SD: 0.7) and 49% were female.Outcome measuresData regarding the number and types of incidental findings were summarised as counts and percentages, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.Results93.8% of participants completed a brain scan (n=471); 4.5% of scanned participants had a pre-defined reportable abnormality on brain MRI (n=21); suspected vascular malformations and suspected intracranial mass lesions were present in 1.9% (n=9) and 1.5% (n=7) respectively; suspected cerebral aneurysms were the single most common vascular abnormality, affecting 1.1% of participants (n=5), and suspected meningiomas were the most common intracranial lesion, affecting 0.6% of participants (n=3); 34.6% of participants had at least one abnormality on clinical blood tests (n=169), but few reached the prespecified threshold for urgent action (n=11).ConclusionsIn older adults, aged 69-71 years, potentially serious brain MRI findings were detected in around 5% of participants, and clinical blood test abnormalities were present in around one third of participants. Knowledge of the expected prevalence of incidental findings in the general population at this age is useful in both research and clinical settings.

Funder

Wellcome Trust

Brain Research Trust

Medical Research Council Dementias Platform UK

Alzheimer’s Research UK

Wolfson Foundation

Medical Research Council

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Managing Incidental Findings in Human Subjects Research: Analysis and Recommendations

2. Medical Research Council, The Wellcome Trust. Framework on the feedback of health-related findings in research 2014. https://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/mrc-wellcome-trust-framework-on-the-feedback-of-health-related-findings-in-researchpdf/ (Accessed 25 Jan 2019).

3. Incidental findings in research: A focus group study about the perspective of the research participant;de Boer;J Magn Reson Imaging,2018

4. Psychosocial consequences and severity of disclosed incidental findings from whole-body MRI in a general population study

5. Impact of detecting potentially serious incidental findings during multi-modal imaging;Gibson;Wellcome Open Res,2017

Cited by 17 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3