Observational study to determine the utility of hospital administrative data to support case finding of English patients at higher risk of severe healthcare-related harm

Author:

Hogan Helen,Cooke-O’Dowd Nora,Chattopadhyay Kaushik,van der Meulen Jan,Sherlaw-Johnson Christopher,Black Nick

Abstract

ObjectivesTo identify ways of using routine hospital data to improve the efficiency of retrospective reviews of case records for identifying avoidable severe harmDesignDevelopment and testing of thresholds and criteria for two indirect indicators of healthcare-related harm (long length of stay (LOS) and emergency readmission) to determine the yield of specified harms coded in Hospital Episode Statistics (HES).SettingAcute National Health Service hospitals in England.ParticipantsHES for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), bowel cancer surgery and hip replacement admissions from 2014 to 2015.InterventionsCase-mix-adjusted linear regression models were used to determine expected LOS. Different thresholds were examined to determine the association with harm. Screening criteria for readmission included time to readmission, length of readmission and diagnoses in initial admission and readmission. The association with harm was examined for each criterion.ResultsThe proportions of AMI cases with a harm code increased from 14% among all cases to 47% if a threshold of three times the expected LOS was used. For hip replacement the respective increase was from 10% to 51%. However as the number of patients at these higher thresholds was small, the overall proportion of harm identified is relatively small (15%, 19%, 9% and 8% among AMI, urgent bowel surgery, elective bowel surgery and hip replacement cohorts, respectively). Selection of the time to readmission had an effect on the yield of harms but this varied with condition. At least 50% of surgical patients had a harm code if readmitted within 7 days compared with 21% of patients with AMI.ConclusionsOur approach would select a substantial number of patients for case record review. Many of these cases would contain no evidence of healthcare-related harm. In practice, Trusts may choose how many reviews it is feasible to do in advance and then select random samples of cases that satisfy the screening criteria.

Funder

UK Department of Health Policy Research Programme

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference27 articles.

1. How often are adverse events reported in English hospital statistics?

2. Australian Institute for Health and Welfare. Reporting of adverse event in routinely collected data sets in Australia: Australian Institute for Health and Welfare, 2001.

3. Extent, nature and consequences of adverse events: results of a retrospective casenote review in a large NHS hospital

4. The Canadian Adverse Events Study: the incidence of adverse events among hospital patients in Canada

5. Adverse events in New Zealand public hospitals I: occurrence and impact;Davis;N Z Med J,2002

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3