Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for acute and chronic pain in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 381 studies (the meta-TENS study)

Author:

Johnson Mark I.ORCID,Paley Carole A.ORCID,Jones Gareth,Mulvey Matthew R.ORCID,Wittkopf Priscilla G.ORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo investigate the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for relief of pain in adults.DesignSystematic review and meta-analysis.Data sourcesMedline, Cochrane Central, Embase (and others) from inception to July 2019 and updated on 17 May 2020.Eligibility criteria for study selectionRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing strong non-painful TENS at or close to the site of pain versus placebo or other treatments in adults with pain, irrespective of diagnosis.Data extraction and synthesisReviewers independently screened, extracted data and assessed risk of bias (RoB, Cochrane tool) and certainty of evidence (Grading and Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Mean pain intensity and proportions of participants achieving reductions of pain intensity (≥30% or >50%) during or immediately after TENS. Random effect models were used to calculate standardised mean differences (SMD) and risk ratios. Subgroup analyses were related to trial methodology and characteristics of pain.ResultsThe review included 381 RCTs (24 532 participants). Pain intensity was lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo (91 RCTs, 92 samples, n=4841, SMD=−0·96 (95% CI −1·14 to –0·78), moderate-certainty evidence). Methodological (eg, RoB, sample size) and pain characteristics (eg, acute vs chronic, diagnosis) did not modify the effect. Pain intensity was lower during or immediately after TENS compared with pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments used as part of standard of care (61 RCTs, 61 samples, n=3155, SMD = −0·72 (95% CI −0·95 to –0·50], low-certainty evidence). Levels of evidence were downgraded because of small-sized trials contributing to imprecision in magnitude estimates. Data were limited for other outcomes including adverse events which were poorly reported, generally mild and not different to comparators.ConclusionThere was moderate-certainty evidence that pain intensity is lower during or immediately after TENS compared with placebo and without serious adverse events.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019125054.

Funder

GlaxoSmithKline

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference42 articles.

1. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019

2. Prevalence and profile of high-impact chronic pain in the United States;Pitcher;J Pain,2019

3. Johnson MI . Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation. In: Watson T , Nussbaum EL , eds. Electrophysical agents. 13 edn. Elsevier, 2020: 264–95.

4. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . Chronic pain (primary and secondary) in over 16S: assessment of all chronic pain and management of chronic primary pain (NG193). London, UK: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2021: 1–36.

5. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) . Nice clinical guideline 55 intrapartum care: care of healthy women and their babies during childbirth. London, 2007: 1–65.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3