Effectiveness and active ingredients of social prescribing interventions targeting mental health: a systematic review

Author:

Cooper MatthewORCID,Avery LeahORCID,Scott JasonORCID,Ashley Kirsten,Jordan Cara,Errington Linda,Flynn DarrenORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveThis study aims to establish the effectiveness and active ingredients of UK-based social prescribing interventions targeting mental health and well-being outcomes.DesignSystematic review adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysies guidelines and a published protocol.Data sourcesNine databases were systematically searched up to March 2022.Eligibility criteriaSocial prescribing interventions in the UK involving adults aged ≥18 years, which reported on mental health outcomes.Data extraction and synthesisTwo reviewers extracted data on study characteristics; outcomes; referral pathways; treatment fidelity strategies; person-centredness; intervention development processes and theory-linked behaviour change techniques (BCTs). Data were narratively synthesised.Results52 074 records were retrieved by the search, 13 interventions reported across 17 studies were included in this review (N=5036 participants at post-intervention). Fifteen studies were uncontrolled before-and-after designs, one a randomised controlled trial and one a matched groups design. The most frequently reported referral pathway was the link worker model (n=12), followed by direct referrals from community services (n=3). Participants were predominantly working age adults, and were referred for anxiety, depression, social isolation and loneliness. 16 out of 17 studies reported statistically significant improvements in outcomes (mental health, mental well-being, general health, or quality of life). Strategies to enhance treatment fidelity were suboptimal across studies. Only two studies used a specific theoretical framework. A few studies reported engaging service users in codesign (n=2) or usability and/or feasibility testing (n=4). Overall, 22 BCTs were coded across 13 interventions. The most frequently coded BCTs were social support-unspecified (n=11), credible source (n=7) and social support-practical (n=6).ConclusionsRobust conclusions on the effectiveness of social prescribing for mental health-related outcomes cannot be made. Future research would benefit from comprehensive intervention developmental processes, with reference to appropriate theory, alongside long-term follow-up outcome assessment, using treatment fidelity strategies and a focus on principle of person-centred care.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020167887.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference83 articles.

1. Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 “long Covid” patients and draft quality principles for services

2. England N . Social prescribing, 2019. Available: https:// www.england.nhs.uk/contact-us/privacy-notice/how-we-use-yourinformation/public-and-partners/social-prescribing/ [Accessed 01 Mar 2020].

3. England N . NHS long term plan, 2019. Available: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/ [Accessed 10 Feb 2021].

4. Non-clinical community interventions: a systematised review of social prescribing schemes

5. Link Worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3