Defining and identifying critical elements of, and lessons learned from addressing, ‘operational readiness’ for public health emergency events, including COVID-19: a scoping review protocol

Author:

English ReneORCID,Yauka Nyasulu Juliet CharityORCID,Berner Karina,Geduld Heike,McCaul Michael,Joseph Conran,Pappin Michele,Gobat Nina,Boulanger Linda Lucy,Louw Quinette

Abstract

IntroductionMuch is known around public health preparedness and response phases. However, between the two phases is operational readiness that comprises the immediate actions needed to respond to a developing risk or hazard. Currently, emergency readiness is embedded in multiple frameworks and policy documents related to the health emergency cycle. However, knowledge about operational readiness’ critical readiness components and actions required by countries to respond to public health eminent threat is not well known. Therefore, we aim to define and identify the critical elements of ‘operational readiness’ for public health emergencies, including COVID-19, and identify lessons learnt from addressing it, to inform the WHO Operational Readiness Framework.Methods and analysisThis is a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute guidance. Reporting will be according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) checklist. MEDLINE, Embase and Web of Science databases and grey literature will be searched and exported into an online systematic review software (eg, Rayyan in this case) for review. The review team, which apart from scoping review methodological experts include content experts in health systems and public health and emergency medicine, prepared an a priori study protocol in consultation with WHO representatives. ATLAS.ti V.9 will be used to conduct thematic data analysis as well as store, organise and retrieve data. Data analysis and presentation will be carried out by five reviewers.Ethics and disseminationThis review will reveal new insights, knowledge and lessons learnt that will translate into an operational framework for readiness actions. In consultation with WHO, findings will be disseminated as appropriate (eg, through professional bodies, conferences and research papers). No ethics approvals are required as no humans will be involved in data collection.Protocol registrationThis rapid scoping review has been registered on Open Science Framework (doi:10.17605/OSF.IO/6SYAH).

Funder

World Health Organization

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference20 articles.

1. Communications in Public Health Emergency Preparedness: A Systematic Review of the Literature

2. Building an evaluation instrument for China's Hospital emergency preparedness: a systematic review of preparedness instruments;Tang;Disaster Med Public Health Prep,2014

3. Application of behavioral theories to disaster and emergency health preparedness: a systematic review;Ejeta;PLoS Curr,2015

4. WHO Emergencies Preparedness Team . Emergency response framework. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241512299

5. Health emergency and disaster risk management (Health-EDRM): developing the research field within the Sendai framework paradigm;STT;Int J Disaster Risk Sci,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3