Factors influencing decisions about whether to participate in health research by people of diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds: a realist review

Author:

Hoverd Eleanor JayneORCID,Hawker-Bond George,Staniszewska Sophie,Dale JeremyORCID

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop and refine a programme theory that explains factors that influence decisions to take part in health research by people of diverse ethnic and cultural backgrounds.DesignRealist review following a sequence of five steps: (a) scoping search and identification of programme theory; (b) evidence searching; (c) critical appraisal and data extraction; (d) organisation of evidence and (e) refinement of programme theory.Eligibility criteriaDocuments (including peer-reviewed articles, grey literature, websites, reports and conference papers) either full text, or a section of relevance to the overarching research question were included.Data sourcesEMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, Psych Info, Google and Google Scholar were searched iteratively between May and August 2020. Search strategy was refined for each database providing a broad enough review for building of programme theory.AnalysisData from eligible documents was extracted to build understanding of the factors that influence decision-making. Data were mapped to create a data matrix according to context (C), mechanism (M), outcome (O), configurations (C) (CMOCs) for the process of informed consent, to aid interpretation and produce final programme theory.Results566 documents were screened and 71 included. Final programme theory was underpinned by CMOCs on processes influencing decisions to take part in research. Key findings indicate the type of infrastructure required, for example, resources, services and policies, to support inclusion in health research, with a greater need to increase the social presence of researchers within communities, improve cultural competency of individuals and organisations, reduce the complexity of participant information, and provide additional resources to support adaptive processes and shared decision making.ConclusionThe review indicates the need for a more inclusive research infrastructure that facilitates diverse participation in health research through incorporating adaptive processes that support shared decision making within the informed consent process and in the conduct of research projects.

Funder

NIHR Health Protection Research Unit Gastrointestinal Infections

NIHR Applied Research Collaboration West Midlands

NIHR HPRU Genomics and Enabling data

HEE/ICA NIHR Pre-doctoral Clinical Academic Fellowships

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference79 articles.

1. Developing a roadmap to improve trial delivery for under-served groups: results from a UK multi-stakeholder process;Witham;Trials,2020

2. Under-representation of minority ethnic groups in research — call for action

3. Jutlla K , Raghavan R . Improving the recruitment of black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) communities in health and social care research: a review of literature, 2017. Available: www.dora.dmu.ac.uk/handle/2086/13221 [Accessed 28 Jun 2020].

4. Consenting of the vulnerable: the informed consent procedure in advanced cancer patients in Mexico

5. Addressing ethnicity in social care research;Vickers;Soc Policy Adm,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3