WHO standards-based tool to measure women’s views on the quality of care around the time of childbirth at facility level in the WHO European region: development and validation in Italy

Author:

Lazzerini MarziaORCID,Argentini Giorgia,Mariani IlariaORCID,Covi Benedetta,Semenzato Chiara,Lincetto Ornella,Muzigaba Moise,Valente Emanuelle PessaORCID

Abstract

ObjectivesA comprehensive WHO standards-based tool to measure women’s perceived quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in health facilities is needed to allow for comparisons of data across settings and over time. This paper describes the development of such a tool, and its validation in Italy.DesignA multiphase, mixed-methods study involving qualitative and quantitative research methods.SettingNine health facilities in Italy.MethodsThe questionnaire was developed in six phases: (1) Defining the scope, characteristics and a potential list of measures for the tool; (2) initial content and construct validation; (3) first field testing to assess acceptability and perceived utility for end-users (1244 women, 35 decision makers) and further explore construct validity; (4) content optimisation and score development; (5) assessment of face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency and (6) second field testing in nine maternity hospitals (4295 women, 78 decision-makers).ResultsThe final version of the tool included 116 questions accounting for 99 out of the 350 of the extended lists of WHO Quality Measures. Observed face validity was very good, with 100% agreement for 101 (87%) questions and Kappa exceeding 0.60 for remaining ones. Reliability was good, with either high agreement or Kappa exceeding 0.60 for all items. Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.84 to 0.88, indicating very good internal consistency. Acceptability across seven hospitals was good (mean response rate: 57.4%, 95% CI 44.4% to 70.5%). The questionnaire proved to be useful, driving the development of actions plan to improve the QMNC in each facility.ConclusionsStudy findings suggest that the tool has good content, construct, face validity, intrarater reliability and internal consistency, while being acceptable and useful. Therefore, it could be used in health facilities in Italy and similar context. More research should investigate how effectively use the tool in different countries for improving the QMNC.

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference45 articles.

1. World Health Organization . Maternal mortality. Available: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortality [Accessed 23 Oct 2020].

2. United Nations Children’s Fund A Neglected Tragedy . The global burden of stillbirths. Report of the un Inter-agency group for child mortality estimation, 2020. Available: https://childmortality.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/UN-IGME-2020-Stillbirth-Report.pdf [Accessed 30 Nov 2020].

3. United Nations Children’s Fund . Levels and trends in child mortality. Report, 2020. Available: https://childmortality.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/UNICEF-2020-Child-Mortality-Report.pdf [Accessed 30 Nov 2020].

4. Harrison S , Alderdice F , Henderson J . You and your baby: a national survey of health and care. Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, 2020. ISBN: 978-0-9956854-5-1.

5. A national survey of women's views of their maternity care in Scotland

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3