Online patient feedback as a measure of quality in primary care: a multimethod study using correlation and qualitative analysis

Author:

Boylan Anne-MarieORCID,Turk Amadea,van Velthoven Michelle HelenaORCID,Powell John

Abstract

ObjectivesTo ascertain the relationship between online patient feedback and the General Practice Patient Survey (GPPS) and the Friends and Family Test (FFT). To consider the potential benefit it may add by describing the content of public reviews found on NHS Choices for all general practices in one Clinical Commissioning Group in England.DesignMultimethod study using correlation and thematic analysis.Setting1396 public online reviews and ratings on NHS Choices for all General Practices (n=70) in Oxfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group in England.ResultsSignificant moderate correlations were found between the online patient feedback and the GPPS and the FFT. Three themes were developed through the qualitative analysis: (1) online feedback largely provides positive reinforcement for practice staff; (2) online feedback is used as a platform for suggesting service organisation and delivery improvements; (3) online feedback can be a source of insight into patients’ expectations of care. These themes illustrate the wide range of topics commented on by patients, including their medical care, relationships with various members of staff, practice facilities, amenities and services in primary care settings.ConclusionsThis multimethod study demonstrates that online feedback found on NHS Choices is significantly correlated with established measures of quality in primary care. This suggests it has a potential use in understanding patient experience and satisfaction, and a potential use in quality improvement and patient safety. The qualitative analysis shows that this form of feedback contains helpful information about patients’ experiences of general practice that provide insight into issues of quality and patient safety relevant to primary care. Health providers should offer patients multiple ways of offering feedback, including online, and should have systems in place to respond to and act on this feedback.

Funder

NIHR Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Oxford

Publisher

BMJ

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Francis R . Independent inquiry into care provided by mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation trust January 2005–March 2009, volume 1. London UK, 2009.

2. Keogh B . Review into the quality of care and treatment provided by 14 Hospital trusts in England, overview report, 2013. London UK, 2013.

3. Berwick D . A promise to learn – a commitment to act: improving the safety of patients in England. London: Health Do, 2013.

4. Robert G , Cornwell J , Black N . Friends and family test should no longer be mandatory. BMJ 2018;360:k367.doi:10.1136/bmj.k367

5. Burt J , Newbould J , Abel G , et al . Investigating the meaning of 'good' or 'very good' patient evaluations of care in English general practice: a mixed methods study. BMJ Open 2017;7:e014718.doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014718

Cited by 20 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3